We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Lets test the knowledge of this forum
hostage_2
Posts: 4 Newbie
Hi all,
Some good tests for all you readers with this one. I am currently selling my house and buying a repossessed one. The difference between the selling and purchasing is very small some 13k however the difference in house is huge, the repossessed house is around £80k cheaper that a comparable house. The following are issues .....
1) Repossessed house has an unfinished extension, structure all built but internal not finished (half electrics done, half plastered etc). Planning permission was given in 2006, I have obtained the plans for the extension and very slight differences, ie one of the rear patio doors is now a window, three velux windows not on the plan. Building regs were inspected including excavation, foundation and damp proofing but nothing more. Have spoke with building control who are not bothered by all this and just advised getting a surveyor to look at it. Anybody been in this position and what did you do?
2) I have a mortgage in two parts, two variable rate mortgages with the same company for my current house, will be porting these and borrowing only a marginal bit more on fixed. Will my solicitor charge me 2x mortgage fee for sale and 3x fee for purchase mortgage fee?
3) I am only going to request searches for my purchase as requested by the mortgage lender ...... any thoughts?
4) No need for the Chancel policy ....... comments?
5) When would the searches done by the repossession company as part of the hips not suffice for the mortgage company? What searches do most mortgage companies request?
6) Will the mortgage company be interested in the planning and building regs issue?
Look forward to any replies!!!!!!
Cheers
Some good tests for all you readers with this one. I am currently selling my house and buying a repossessed one. The difference between the selling and purchasing is very small some 13k however the difference in house is huge, the repossessed house is around £80k cheaper that a comparable house. The following are issues .....
1) Repossessed house has an unfinished extension, structure all built but internal not finished (half electrics done, half plastered etc). Planning permission was given in 2006, I have obtained the plans for the extension and very slight differences, ie one of the rear patio doors is now a window, three velux windows not on the plan. Building regs were inspected including excavation, foundation and damp proofing but nothing more. Have spoke with building control who are not bothered by all this and just advised getting a surveyor to look at it. Anybody been in this position and what did you do?
2) I have a mortgage in two parts, two variable rate mortgages with the same company for my current house, will be porting these and borrowing only a marginal bit more on fixed. Will my solicitor charge me 2x mortgage fee for sale and 3x fee for purchase mortgage fee?
3) I am only going to request searches for my purchase as requested by the mortgage lender ...... any thoughts?
4) No need for the Chancel policy ....... comments?
5) When would the searches done by the repossession company as part of the hips not suffice for the mortgage company? What searches do most mortgage companies request?
6) Will the mortgage company be interested in the planning and building regs issue?
Look forward to any replies!!!!!!
Cheers
0
Comments
-
1. building control are not interested in planning and vice versa. The changes wouldn't bother me, even if technically they do not comply with the PP granted. Some people may be bothered, but in my mind a window is less obtrusive than a door and velux windows could be added at a later date without need for PP so the fact they were added at the same time isn't that relevent and could be lost in the history of the house in a few years.
2. Shouldn't make a difference if they are all with the same lender as it should be one charge on the properties.
3. If you know the area.
4. Seek solicitors advice but again if you know the area you can assess the risk.
5. If they are out of date.
6. They will say that your solicitor should check that PP and building certificates have been obtained. Without them they may only be prepared to lend on the completed part of the house. Only really a worry if your LTV is near the lenders limit.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0 -
Silvercar thanks for your comments, appears you think the same way about me. Appreciate your comments about the mortgage transfer fees and the LTV re mortgage poss lending on the old part of the house. Thankfully I am getting it at such a bargain I hope there will be no problems.
Thanks again,
Hostage0 -
The velux windows could probably be added without planning permission at a later date, unless a restrictive condition on the planning permission restricts the insertion of any further windows. If that is the case, then the whole extension as built does not benefit from any planning permission, but like silvercar says, I wouldn't worry about it as the chances are they would not require PP anyway. If you want to formalise it all, then just submit revised plans seeking a minor amendment to the existing permission.The changes wouldn't bother me, even if technically they do not comply with the PP granted. Some people may be bothered, but in my mind a window is less obtrusive than a door and velux windows could be added at a later date without need for PP so the fact they were added at the same time isn't that relevent and could be lost in the history of the house in a few years.0 -
Cheers for the advice, all offers accepted now and got a further 2.5k of it. Viewed it last night with a QS who pointed me in the right direction, lots of work to be done. Thanks for the replies and keep them coming

Hostage0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
