We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Graphics Card Update
Comments
-
Another thing to consider, is that the lower-mid range graphic cards and CPUs are becoming more power efficient. I was rather surprised at the power usage dip recently when I upgraded my machine from a P4 3GHz with a 6800GT graphic card, to a Core 2 Duo 3GHz with a GTX260.
Its probably because the processors are smaller. The smaller the chip the less power needed to run it. Also the emphasis changed with the DUO. Rather than making a chip that simply runs faster, they added more cores. And since each tick of the clock requires power (hence the need to up voltage if you overclock - you dont get something for nothing), you'll save power if you do more per tick.SIMPLE SIMON - Met a pie man going to the fair. Said Simple Simon to the pie man, "What have you got there?" Said the pie man unto Simon, "Pies, you simpleton!"0 -
If you want midrange graphics have a loot at the ATI 4670, its doesn't need any extra power (draws all it needs from PCI-E) slot, it doesn't use much at all.
I lokk at the ampage on power supplies more than wattage, personnally I am running a winpower 850w supply, I know its never going to push that but it does cope nicely with my system.Have my first business premises (+4th business) 01/11/2017
Quit day job to run 3 businesses 08/02/2017
Started third business 25/06/2016
Son born 13/09/2015
Started a second business 03/08/2013
Officially the owner of my own business since 13/01/20120 -
I already know that - but my previous CPU was a P4 Prescott (aka: Presc-hot) which enjoyed guzzling electricity, even when idle.HappyIdiotTalk wrote: »Its probably because the processors are smaller. The smaller the chip the less power needed to run it. Also the emphasis changed with the DUO. Rather than making a chip that simply runs faster, they added more cores. And since each tick of the clock requires power (hence the need to up voltage if you overclock - you dont get something for nothing), you'll save power if you do more per tick.
I expected a next-gen 3GHz CPU to consume about the same power - but the other half expected it to be more conservative on the power side, because of the development in technologies etc.Everybody is equal; However some are more equal than others.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards