We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The End of the Beginning - GS or BS?
Generali
Posts: 36,411 Forumite
It looks to me (anecdotally at least) that corporate borrowing is starting to happen again, mostly through the corporate bond market.
If companies can borrow they can invest, if they can invest they can employ. Employees spend money on things made by other employees, safeguarding more jobs.
My guess is that this at least means that some sort of bottom may be in sight, perhaps in 18 months or so as that is typically the lag between investment starting to rise and employment levels increasing.
We're not out of the woods yet but perhaps the very first signs of recovery in debt markets can be seen.
If companies can borrow they can invest, if they can invest they can employ. Employees spend money on things made by other employees, safeguarding more jobs.
My guess is that this at least means that some sort of bottom may be in sight, perhaps in 18 months or so as that is typically the lag between investment starting to rise and employment levels increasing.
We're not out of the woods yet but perhaps the very first signs of recovery in debt markets can be seen.
0
Comments
-
It looks to me (anecdotally at least) that corporate borrowing is starting to happen again, mostly through the corporate bond market.
If companies can borrow they can invest, if they can invest they can employ. Employees spend money on things made by other employees, safeguarding more jobs.
My guess is that this at least means that some sort of bottom may be in sight, perhaps in 18 months or so as that is typically the lag between investment starting to rise and employment levels increasing.
We're not out of the woods yet but perhaps the very first signs of recovery in debt markets can be seen.
I was just wondering how you were:)0 -
lostinrates wrote: »I was just wondering how you were:)
Judging by what's written in his post, not very well by the sounds of it.
Rob0 -
lostinrates wrote: »I was just wondering how you were:)
Very well thanks. Had a short holiday about 3 hours south of Sydney here:
It's a lovely spot and very relaxing.
The problems we have at the moment are a direct result of the credit markets seizing up. Any real sign of things easing on that front is good news for the economy in the longer term.
There is clearly a (very) long way to go but it's a start.0 -
Am thanking you for the optimistic post, Generali, not the vile, cruel photograph of your recent holiday.
Jen
x0 -
some whacky economic indices supposedly predicting the state of the economy.
lip stick index and foundation index - i wonder what they are predicting now based on these indices?
another similar one ...
Uptick in Vasectomies Seen as Sign of Recession dont know what this is called. probably the 'Snip index' i guessbubblesmoney :hello:0 -
an extract from the blogs on the FTHistory teaches us that systemic financial crises are protracted affairs. A most interesting paper by Carmen M. Reinhart and Kenneth S. Rogoff, “The Aftermath of Financial Crises”, using data on 10 systemic banking crises (the “big five” developed economy crises ................, three famous emerging market crises ............. and two earlier crises (Norway 1899 and the United States 1929) reaches the following conclusions (the next paragraph paraphrases Reinhart and Rogoff).
First, asset market collapses are deep and prolonged. Real housing price declines average 35 percent over six years; real equity price declines average 55 percent over a downturn of about 3.5 years. Second, the aftermath of banking crises is associated with large declines in output and employment. The unemployment rate rises an average of 7 percentage points over the down phase of the cycle which lasts on average over four years. Output falls (from peak to trough) an average of over 9 percent, but the duration of the downturn averages around 2 years.
...........
For both countries there is a material risk that the mind-boggling general government deficits (14% of GDP or over for the US and 12 % of GDP or over for the UK for the coming year) will either have to be monetised permanently, ...............or lead to sovereign default.
Pointing to a non-negligible risk of sovereign default in the US and the UK does not, I fear, qualify me as a madman. The last time things got serious, during the Great Depression of the 1930s, both the US and the UK defaulted de facto, and possibly even de jure, on their sovereign debt.
In the case of the US, the sovereign default took the form of the abrogation of the gold clause when the US went off the gold standard (except for foreign exchange) in 1933. In 1933, Congress passed a joint resolution canceling all gold clauses in public and private contracts (including existing contracts). .........................
In the case of the UK, the de facto sovereign default took the form of the conversion in 1932 of Britain’s 5% War Loan Bonds (callable 1929-1947) into new 3½ % bonds (callable from 1952) on terms that were unambiguously unfavourable to the bond holders.
.......
Similar circumstances could arise again.bubblesmoney :hello:0 -
It looks to me (anecdotally at least) that corporate borrowing is starting to happen again, mostly through the corporate bond market.
If companies can borrow they can invest, if they can invest they can employ. Employees spend money on things made by other employees, safeguarding more jobs.
My guess is that this at least means that some sort of bottom may be in sight, perhaps in 18 months or so as that is typically the lag between investment starting to rise and employment levels increasing.
We're not out of the woods yet but perhaps the very first signs of recovery in debt markets can be seen.
careful Gen - some people may call it a dead cat bounce
0 -
careful Gen - some people may call it a dead cat bounce

I'm not saying everything's going to be fine now or even in 18 months but there appear to be signs of life in some of the darker corners of the debt markets.
Of course that's not necessarily great news for people looking at house prices to rise as interest rates will clearly rise rapidly from here if/when debt markets normalise (and by normalise I don't mean like 2005-7).0 -
Im thinking a 'recovery' would kick start inflation so that in real terms we dont see actual growth. So long as its not a collapse then I guess that would still be a positive0
-
There maybe signs of a credit flowing again but its a big step to connect that with recovery. GM is still on death's door, there is still a banking crisis looming in Eastern Europe.
At least that means that new ideas can hopefully move from imagination to fruition but for now the cancer is still spreading and given how rickety the fundamentals of the last boom were (house price boom + cheap credit) were its unlikely there will be a return to the previous status quo.
The question is what will the new order be?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
