We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
comparing fund performance
Options

crisp
Posts: 435 Forumite
I am trying to compare the performance of various funds in similar sectors over the last 5 years.
I have tried to use H-L but they do it year by year so its not easy to do a comparison over 5 years.
I then tried iii, but they give the top 10 funds in a limited number of sectors. Just trying to get head around digital look, but i dont think its fund screener is suitable.
Maybe I am missing something, but any suggestions of where I can compare funds i.e. china, pacific ex japan, commodities (gold, oil), recovery funds, brazil/latin america, africa?
thanks
I have tried to use H-L but they do it year by year so its not easy to do a comparison over 5 years.
I then tried iii, but they give the top 10 funds in a limited number of sectors. Just trying to get head around digital look, but i dont think its fund screener is suitable.
Maybe I am missing something, but any suggestions of where I can compare funds i.e. china, pacific ex japan, commodities (gold, oil), recovery funds, brazil/latin america, africa?
thanks
0
Comments
-
I have tried to use H-L but they do it year by year so its not easy to do a comparison over 5 years.
discrete performance is more informative than cumulative performance.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
discrete performance is more informative than cumulative performance.
when comparing funds what approach do you find most informative i.e. culmative performance over say 3 or 5 years or performance year on year or say last month or 3-months etc?
it all seems like data to me and not information0 -
cumulative can mask an event where they got lucky. Discrete shows individual periods and can indicate consistency. Of course, most important is knowing the risk of the fund as often performance is more in line with risks taken by that fund. In periods of growth the higher risk funds in the sector often perform better than the lower risk ones. Just because funds are in a same sector does not mean they are all the same risk.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
-
Try Trustnet. You can construct graphs for various timescales, and add funds to compare.
I think Trustnet are great. there is so much information on their site and they give great service considering I am not buying anything. It's the place I go to compare funds. Share.Com which has been around a long time is excellent for
looking at individual shares.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards