We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Benefits Question
Comments
-
alwaysonthego wrote: »If someone has substantial savings that would affect any entitlement to benefits and they were at risk from redundancy then it is sensible that person does not go and pay a lump sum off his mortgage etc
Doesn't Martin regularly advise people to use lump sums to pay off their debts rather than keep them as savings? Generally because people are charged more interest on their borrowing (be that a mortgage or any other form of borrowing) than they receive from their savings.0 -
The DMG says that paying off a non-immediate debt is likely to be deprivation of capital. I've posted the relevant section on here before. It can be a bit harsh but the decision likely to go against the claimant.0
-
Yes it is a very sensible thing to do, if you are not doing it in order to claim means tested benefits.Doesn't Martin regularly advise people to use lump sums to pay off their debts rather than keep them as savings? Generally because people are charged more interest on their borrowing (be that a mortgage or any other form of borrowing) than they receive from their savings.0 -
You should ask if it can be made a sticky on here because not many people realise and it causes big arguments on here when we try and say otherwise.The DMG says that paying off a non-immediate debt is likely to be deprivation of capital. I've posted the relevant section on here before. It can be a bit harsh but the decision likely to go against the claimant.0 -
It was part of a long thread so making it a sticky probably wouldnt make much sense to people. It might be worth creating a thread though if its thought worthwhile enough. I've quoted it again below.Have people deprived themselves of capital
Meaning of deprive
29815 The meaning of deprive is not a question of law and should be given its normal
every day meaning
1. So claimants have deprived themselves of capital if they nolonger have it even if they use it to1.get1.1other capital2 or
1.2 personal possessions or2.
pay debts.
1 R(SB) 40/85; 2 R(SB) 40/850
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards