We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MBNA slammed by Judge !

'It's a blatant trap': Fraud trial judge slams 'irresponsible' MBNA for sending credit cheques to man on benefits

OK the defendant was wrong to cash the cheques but good to see a Judge rollicking MBNA for putting temptation in someones way .

shammy
«1

Comments

  • The judge quite clearly said that the accused man was not wrong to have cashed the cheques.

    He subsequently committed fraud and that was the crime of which he was convicted.
    ...............................I have put my clock back....... Kcolc ym
  • BlueAngelCV
    BlueAngelCV Posts: 671 Forumite
    He wasn't wrong to cash the cheques if he intended to pay them back. He clearly didn't though so it was wrong!

    Yes the company shouldn't have sent them to him but this is entirely his fault. It's not even like he was desperate so he spent them on things he needed.
    Wedding 5th September 2015
  • jonesMUFCforever
    jonesMUFCforever Posts: 28,898 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'm in no way defending MBNA here but how were they supposed to know if the man was on benefits or not?
  • I'm in no way defending MBNA here but how were they supposed to know if the man was on benefits or not?


    You could have fooled me!
    ...............................I have put my clock back....... Kcolc ym
  • benf90
    benf90 Posts: 590 Forumite
    You could have fooled me!

    It's a valid point I would say. Unless he told them he was on benefits then they aren't going to know.
  • PROLIANT
    PROLIANT Posts: 6,396 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    He wasn't wrong to cash the cheques if he intended to pay them back. He clearly didn't though so it was wrong!

    Yes the company shouldn't have sent them to him but this is entirely his fault. It's not even like he was desperate so he spent them on things he needed.
    So he lied on his CC Application then? :confused:
    Since when has the world of computer software design been about what people want? This is a simple question of evolution. The day is quickly coming when every knee will bow down to a silicon fist, and you will all beg your binary gods for mercy.
  • PROLIANT
    PROLIANT Posts: 6,396 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Oh another case of "I am a victim, I am not responsible, I was forced to commit to a CCA" idiots, get a grip on your lives and take ownership for your actions, childish, immature and quite frankly "spineless" :rolleyes:
    Since when has the world of computer software design been about what people want? This is a simple question of evolution. The day is quickly coming when every knee will bow down to a silicon fist, and you will all beg your binary gods for mercy.
  • normanmark
    normanmark Posts: 4,156 Forumite
    I would hardly say they were 'slammed'.
  • so2006
    so2006 Posts: 638 Forumite
    Seriously MBNA are not the best company, one of my 15 year old cousins applied for a Credit card (Dont ask why lol) And he ended up getting a letter saying he was declined, but then another one a couple of weeks later saying he should call them, they will process his application and issue a card with a £3,000 credit limit! I was shocked!

    So his parents told him off and he cant leave the house now.

    Well this guy, should pay every penny back. He knew this money had to be paid back, and spent it on useless stuff! I mean come on a quad bike! !!!!!!!

    So there both to blame. either the judge was high or was drunk lol

    and i would not mind having him as my judge if i ever get in trouble with my credit cards! lmao
  • exel1966
    exel1966 Posts: 5,078 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I think the saddest part of this case is ;-

    'admitted fraud and was conditionally discharged for two years. He was ordered to pay £150 prosecution costs.

    What kind of deterrent is that ? As per usual, a slap on the wrist, a ticking off ! It's no wonder there are so many people who think nothing of spending someone elses money and having no intention to repay it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.