We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Homebuyers could be forced to put down a deposit of at least 15 per cent
Comments
-
Didn’t people save hard and put down big deposits like your OH which a lot of people now are not prepared to do now.
I think many people in the past few years haven't been prepared to put down deposits when buying a home because they didn't need to -- why bother if the bank was prepared to take all the risk? The crazy lending changed prevailing attitudes -- for a long time after prices started falling there were still people over on the house buying and renting forum asking where they could get a 100% mortgage. In another 5 years or so the majority of people will be back to expecting they have to save up a deposit first.0 -
I think many people in the past few years haven't been prepared to put down deposits when buying a home because they didn't need to -- why bother if the bank was prepared to take all the risk? .
Further to that I think most people in Britain, still, don't equate home ownership with risk.0 -
That makes sense but has sense got anything to do with it
I think that this is the key .... personal responsbility. Not only with mortgages but with credit cards, etc. A large deposit would make folk alot more responsible something that is lacking in the UK, where mewing and spending others cash is seen as acceptable.0 -
lostinrates wrote: »Further to that I think most people in Britain, still, don't equate home ownership with risk.
"Safe as houses" is a uniquely British phrase!0 -
"Safe as houses" is a uniquely British phrase!
Typically back then a centurion would save a ten per cent deposit, and be able to borrow approx. three times main income in order to buy his first safartus hostrectum. Progress eh?0 -
It's actually goes back a bit further than that. Safe from the Latin, safartus meaning guaranteed, and hostrectum meaning a dwelling place or abode. The phrase safartus hostrectum would typical describe a centurions family dwelling, meaning a safe place to return after the various wars.
Typically back then a centurion would save a ten per cent deposit, and be able to borrow approx. three times main income in order to buy his first safartus hostrectum. Progress eh?
:rotfl::rotfl: the Romans also had a nice useful little phrase: caveat emptor!;)0 -
That has been the whole problem ... of remortgaging and releasing equity.
Perhaps if they go back to calling these loans "secured loans against your property" instead of "equity release" people might realise just what they are and not be so keen to take them out.RENTING? Have you checked to see that your landlord has permission from their mortgage lender to rent the property? If not, you could be thrown out with very little notice.
Read the sticky on the House Buying, Renting & Selling board.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards