📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Corporate Bonds vs Equity Income Funds - any thoughts?

2»

Comments

  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Yes if you want. You could spread the risk even further by putting it into 3 different corporate bond funds. So £1200 in each.

    Just so you know, S&S ISAs still have tax, the dividends are always taxed 10%, theres no way around this. However you won't pay the higher dividend rate if you are/become a higher tax payer and you don't pay Capital Gains Tax.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,814 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I wouldnt discard them. However, making it a smaller part of your portfolio is still valid. In very simple terms you could do 80/20 with 80% in fixed interest funds and 20% in equity income or the Sch Inc Maximiser (which isnt in equity income but does aim for 7% yield and is slightly more defensive than Eq income).
    Just so you know, S&S ISAs still have tax, the dividends are always taxed 10%, theres no way around this. However you won't pay the higher dividend rate if you are/become a higher tax payer and you don't pay Capital Gains Tax.
    Thats with equity funds. With fixed interest funds that would not be the case. They can get the tax back.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    dunstonh wrote: »
    Thats with equity funds. With fixed interest funds that would not be the case. They can get the tax back.

    What do you mean 'they can get the tax back'? i.e. is it always taken and you can reclaim? or is this done automatically (you don't see it but it is done)?

    I'm assuming its the latter...
  • cheerfulcat
    cheerfulcat Posts: 3,403 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Lokolo wrote: »
    Just so you know, S&S ISAs still have tax, the dividends are always taxed 10%, theres no way around this.

    Just to be clear - they are not taxed, they are treated as though they had been. That's why the 10% can't be reclaimed in an ISA ( unlike the previous situation where dividends were actually taxed at 25% with the tax reclaimable within tax-free vehicles ).

    Margaretclare, it has been said that the greatest returns from equity investment have come from re-investing dividends so from that point of view an equity income fund should do well. I'd agree with the others on going for a spread of funds - and be prepared for some shorter term losses.
  • margaretclare
    margaretclare Posts: 10,789 Forumite
    Thanks very much to everyone for the thoughts. The beauty of a site like this is that it enables us to think through different options.
    Margaretclare, it has been said that the greatest returns from equity investment have come from re-investing dividends so from that point of view an equity income fund should do well. I'd agree with the others on going for a spread of funds - and be prepared for some shorter term losses.

    Thank you for this. I've been thinking along these lines myself. I've actually made money, lost money, but all in all it has balanced out pretty well. I haven't actually been scared off these type of investments, not yet anyway! I do still want my capital - hard-earned as it has been - to 'grow'. Nothing is without risk.
    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
    Before I found wisdom, I became old.
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    margaretclare, as dunstonh explained, you can adjust the percentages to get the overall risk where you want it to be while still having a mixture of some higher risk and some lower risk.

    For example, you might consider something like:

    5% emerging markets
    10% global growth
    30% UK equity income (and/or the income maximiser fund)
    55% bonds of several types

    The idea is that the first two provide some greater potential for capital growth to try to keep up with inflation but even if they were to lose 50% they still couldn't reduce the total value by more than 7.5% because they only make up 15% of the total.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.