Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
Unemployment tops two million
Options
Comments
-
-
mr.broderick wrote: »I would suggest only 6.5% employed to be catastrophic.
I reckon as a rule of thumb, unemployment over about 8% and rising is pretty bad - if you're laid off you'll be unlikely to find something else quickly in the private sector unless you get lucky or have specialised skills which are still in demand.
Over 10% is the start of catastrophic. French unemployment has been around that level for years and it's terrible - it's very hard for a young French person to start a career as there's all this competition from trained, experienced people who don't have jobs.0 -
I reckon as a rule of thumb, unemployment over about 8% and rising is pretty bad - if you're laid off you'll be unlikely to find something else quickly in the private sector unless you get lucky or have specialised skills which are still in demand.
Over 10% is the start of catastrophic. French unemployment has been around that level for years and it's terrible - it's very hard for a young French person to start a career as there's all this competition from trained, experienced people who don't have jobs.
Generali, I think you missed the point?0 -
lostinrates wrote: »Generali, I think you missed the point?
Probably. I played two games of football last night and today I'm feeling very tired and very sore.
Worse, I promised to take the Generlissimos out this afternoon.
It hurts.0 -
Probably. I played two games of football last night and today I'm feeling very tired and very sore.
Worse, I promised to take the Generlissimos out this afternoon.
It hurts.
Its ok, even you are allowed occasional mistakes. Its a 'mis type' it should have read 6% unemployed but read ''employed'' instead. Mr B was being clever. Which is nice for him, once in a while0 -
lostinrates wrote: »Its ok, even you are allowed occasional mistakes. Its a 'mis type' it should have read 6% unemployed but read ''employed'' instead. Mr B was being clever. Which is nice for him, once in a while
Doh!
It's not even like we won the games. 1-0 and 1-1. Dodgy ref in the 2nd game too which was annoying.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 248K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards