We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Tax Havens - a good thing ?

123457»

Comments

  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    gingerdad wrote: »
    The largest tax haven in the world is the City of London, look at the Non Doms etc.. so before people spout on about other "Tax Havens" look closer to home......

    GD
    You're spot on.
  • GingerSte
    GingerSte Posts: 2,486 Forumite
    I imagine we wouldn't be able to get rid of tax havens totally, but that there are things governments could do to get rid of some of the loopholes that allow them to exist.

    For example, the logo issue. Certain companies apparently avoid tax by having a company in a tax haven charge for their logo, and those profits would be immune from tax. Could the government decide that all payments to companies in tax havens be excluded from tax calculations (eg VAT)?
  • John_Pierpoint
    John_Pierpoint Posts: 8,401 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Does anyone have experience of the Californian "sunshine" legislation?
    I think it is meant to work like this: "Our accountants have worked out that you make a profit of 100 million world wide.
    10% of your sales are in California, so we are going to tax you on 10 million of profits, what ever your dodgy transfer price manipulated figures may say.

    As California is a very competitive market such a law is probably unfair but it gets the message across.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.