We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Council announces £7 minimum wage

«13

Comments

  • antilles
    antilles Posts: 365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Hmm...
    Council leader Steven Purcell said the move would boost the wage packets of the lowest paid staff by more than £1,100 a year. He issued a challenge to other employers to do the same.
    Easy for him to say when he's not spending his own money. I can just see all Glasgow businesses saying "Hey - why don't we give everyone a huge rise.. after all.. if Steve can do it.. so can we!!" ;)
  • beingjdc
    beingjdc Posts: 1,680 Forumite
    Merry-go-round, but probably worth it. The government would be topping most of these people's wages up with tax credits anyway, so the cost to the taxpayer isn't the full £1 an hour extra, and the low-paid are more likely to spend their pay in the local economy, so overall may well be good for the area - I bet it's only about 100-200 people at the council itself who are affected anyway, whereas if Glasgow Travelodge (I'm picking on them this week!) can take a few pennies out of their Chief Exec's £400k pay packet to up their cleaners' pay to £13,400 a year, the local economy could really benefit.
    Hurrah, now I have more thankings than postings, cheers everyone!
  • Just after the government announces its plans to create new money, how convenient.
  • tirano
    tirano Posts: 111 Forumite
    beingjdc wrote: »
    Merry-go-round, but probably worth it. The government would be topping most of these people's wages up with tax credits anyway, so the cost to the taxpayer isn't the full £1 an hour extra, and the low-paid are more likely to spend their pay in the local economy, so overall may well be good for the area - I bet it's only about 100-200 people at the council itself who are affected anyway, whereas if Glasgow Travelodge (I'm picking on them this week!) can take a few pennies out of their Chief Exec's £400k pay packet to up their cleaners' pay to £13,400 a year, the local economy could really benefit.

    The tax credits are paid by Central Government, wheras this move will impact on local Council Tax Payers.
    Those in the Council earning higher wages will want to maintain their differentials, so the impact will be across the Council
  • treliac
    treliac Posts: 4,524 Forumite
    beingjdc wrote: »
    Merry-go-round, but probably worth it. The government would be topping most of these people's wages up with tax credits anyway, so the cost to the taxpayer isn't the full £1 an hour extra, and the low-paid are more likely to spend their pay in the local economy, so overall may well be good for the area - I bet it's only about 100-200 people at the council itself who are affected anyway, whereas if Glasgow Travelodge (I'm picking on them this week!) can take a few pennies out of their Chief Exec's £400k pay packet to up their cleaners' pay to £13,400 a year, the local economy could really benefit.

    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.html?p=19522793&postcount=65

    It's allegedly 80,000 people working for Glasgow council!
  • beingjdc
    beingjdc Posts: 1,680 Forumite
    treliac wrote: »
    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.html?p=19522793&postcount=65

    It's allegedly 80,000 people working for Glasgow council!

    That's not logically possible, I'm pretty sure that means in Glasgow, rather than for the Council!
    Hurrah, now I have more thankings than postings, cheers everyone!
  • beingjdc
    beingjdc Posts: 1,680 Forumite
    tirano wrote: »
    The tax credits are paid by Central Government, wheras this move will impact on local Council Tax Payers.
    Those in the Council earning higher wages will want to maintain their differentials, so the impact will be across the Council

    That's what they said about the minimum wage in general in 1997, but there wasn't huge wage inflation across the board. The trend of local government pay settlements over the last three or four years has been that the headline increase is fairly low, but the lowest couple of pay scales get a flat increase that works out as a bigger percentage.
    Hurrah, now I have more thankings than postings, cheers everyone!
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I don't see that it would make much difference to "the pot". So many people get a top up with Working Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit nowadays that they get more than £7/hour once they've had that top up.

    So the minimum up to £7 is most likely to be benefitting single people who don't get those.

    It'd be paid out of council tax, but the Govt's tax credits would reduce.
  • treliac
    treliac Posts: 4,524 Forumite
    tirano wrote: »
    The tax credits are paid by Central Government, wheras this move will impact on local Council Tax Payers.
    Those in the Council earning higher wages will want to maintain their differentials, so the impact will be across the Council

    Either way the public fund it all (as we do the bill for benefits). Doesn't make a case for not giving proper rewards to people providing essential services.

    Can't see an argument around differentials. It's not like the private sector and lifting the lowest paid slightly isn't going to have the better paid jumping up and down.
  • treliac
    treliac Posts: 4,524 Forumite
    beingjdc wrote: »
    That's not logically possible, I'm pretty sure that means in Glasgow, rather than for the Council!

    Yes, I've just re-read it. :o:o (double blush!)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.