We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Sacked for a facebook status update...any help/thoughts/advice?
Comments
-
Id just delete the update from your profile and deny it, onus is on them to prove it. Even if they had a print out/screen shot it wouldnt stand up in court as it could easily have been forged.
My company warned us all recently about facebook updates, so its obviously something companies are onto.
Like an earlier poster said, its safest not to be facebook friends with any colleagues, Im not.0 -
Even if they had a print out/screen shot it wouldnt stand up in court.
It more than likely would in a tribuneral & if you lied to one of them & got found out any real claim you had would be worthless.Not Again0 -
It seems excessive to dismiss , even if it is in contract .Would depend probably on how clear the "rule " was .
However unless he s been there more than a year any fairness or otherwise is probably not relevant as he can`t take an unfair dismissal claim0 -
Yeah I agree with those that say the friend has no leg to stand on.
It's in the contract. My last employer even updated the employment handbook to include webmail like hotmail as misconduct.
The computers are not yours, therefore everything belongs to the company. The logs are checked and they are allowed to go through your email.
The only bad thing about the facebook thing is you could be at home in your own time, and still fall foul of the contract by discussing your employer online.
Damn shame if you get caught out.I've used M.S.E to sort out my debts,my savings, my insurance, my LIFE.
Back on track now so much love to Mr Lewis!:money:0 -
the firm pays people to work, not surf the flippin' net, AND then diss your boss!Long time away from MSE, been dealing real life stuff..
Sometimes seen lurking on the compers forum :-)0 -
If his facebook status is set to private, people in his network won't be able to see his status, only his friends. If it's set so that his profile is viewable by his 'friends and my network', people in his network will be able to see it.
Regardless of this, how can a company justify suspension because 'somebody said' that was his status?
The company has no proof and it is his colleagues word against his.
Either you haven't told us the full details or the company is at fault.0 -
we are not allowed to discuss bonuses and therefore this would be a disciplinary offence with my large company.There are times when parenthood seems nothing but feeding the mouth that bites you Peter De VriesDebt free by 40 (27/11/2016)0
-
chivers1977 wrote: »we are not allowed to discuss bonuses and therefore this would be a disciplinary offence with my large company.
There is a difference between putting your bonus online in full public view and discussing it quietly among colleagues to find out if you are being discriminated against.
I worked for a company where you weren't allowed to discuss bonuses and salaries, myself and the group I worked with ignored the rule and discovered that that there was some interesting discrimination going on which wasn't based solely on sex.I'm not cynical I'm realistic
(If a link I give opens pop ups I won't know I don't use windows)0 -
From what I can gather a colleague brought it up with a manager, who then had a printout of the offending page. First the update said "Happy that RBS are paying bonuses to those under 25k" - one of his friends is a team leader who told him to change it, and this is what I think has shafted him, it changed to, "his status is nothing to do with RBS, any of its subsiduaries or the mexicans defaulting which got us into this mess in the first place!" - a sarcastic response but one purely in jest. Spoke to him today, reckons the HR dept. are gunning for a sacking. I still think denial has got to be the best policy because there is no way of proving it was him and not his fiancee.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards