We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House Insurance Problem
1jacks64
Posts: 171 Forumite
I'm a beneficiary under my grandmother's will and I am buying out my uncle's share of my grandmother's house. The house is unfurnished but I am planning and I am not planning to move into the house immediately and it could end up being unoccupied for a year or more.
Obviously the house needs to be insured as my mortgage lender demands this. At the time when I arranged the insurance through the company which my mortgage lender put me with they asked the question on the phone "Will the house be occupied for 60 days or more?" and I answered yes. However, this won't actually be the case.
What I want to know is will home insurers insure an un-occupied property? Or do they not touch un-occupied properties with a bargepole because they are too much of a risk? And are there specific insurers that people know of who will insure an un-occupied property?
Any help greatly appreciated.
Obviously the house needs to be insured as my mortgage lender demands this. At the time when I arranged the insurance through the company which my mortgage lender put me with they asked the question on the phone "Will the house be occupied for 60 days or more?" and I answered yes. However, this won't actually be the case.
What I want to know is will home insurers insure an un-occupied property? Or do they not touch un-occupied properties with a bargepole because they are too much of a risk? And are there specific insurers that people know of who will insure an un-occupied property?
Any help greatly appreciated.
0
Comments
-
I used to own a second home and Nationwide insured it for me even if it was unoccupied and unfurnished. :beer:0
-
some requirements thought require to switch of water ( i think)0
-
Call your insurance company and advise them that the property will now be unoccupied for 60 days or more. They may still be able to cover you.
But there are companies who will cover unoccupied properties - try https://www.biba.org.uk/ who may be able to suggest companies who will provide this cover.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
Van1971 - I don't know how you got Nationwide to insure your un-occupied second home. I had a look on their website and it says there that the home mustn't be unoccupied.0
-
1jacks64 wrote:Van1971 - I don't know how you got Nationwide to insure your un-occupied second home. I had a look on their website and it says there that the home mustn't be unoccupied.
If you download the pdf of the policy for buildings insurance they do cover unoccupied and unfurnished properties as long as you fullfil certain conditions such as switching off the water and gas supply and doing an inspection every 14 days0 -
Thanks Suki.0
-
I know of a company that will insure an unoccupied property for up to 90 days - to date this is the longest amount of unoccupied cover ive managed to find. I'm not sure how long you have to reside in the property to "occupy it" but when I have spoken to this company on the phone on behalf of my buy to let clients they have said as long as they are informed when the property has been unoccupied for more than 90 days, and the heating is left on a timer on low in cold whether (prevents pipe bursts) and if the property is inspected once every 14 days these see no reason why the cover should not remain in force. They are pretty cheap for premiums too.
PM for further details.I am a Mortgage Adviser
You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards