We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Service Charge Deficit
Leebobs
Posts: 40 Forumite
Dear All,
In late January I received a letter from our leasehold management company (Trinity Estates) containing the audited accounts for the year ending in July 2008.
The accounts indicated an overspend of £6462.60 which when apportioned to each of the flats is £215.42.
The flats themselves are only four years old and but for some minor works to one of the gateposts (when some idiot hit it with a car), there has, to my knowledge been no work at the flat.
The covering letter stated that they would take the money from all those with Direct Debits in March and the only explanation provided was that the money was needed as a result of "unforeseen works to the pumps" and the requirement of an annual maintenance contract.
I have sent two e-mails asking a series of questions about the works we are being charged for, including:
What are these "pumps"?
Where are they located?
What is their function?
Do they service each block of flats equally, or was the fault limited to one of the buildings on site (if so which one)?
What was the fault with the "pumps" which required such an expensive remedy?
Why is a maintenance contract required?
How many quotes did you obtain before agreeing a) the work b) the maintenance contract?
On what date were you aware of the fault and when was it rectified?
Was consideration given as to whether the cost of remedying this fault could be claimed against either the Buildings Insurance or such building guarantee's as may be in existence?
The company have thusfar ignored everything which has been sent to them.
Does anyone know what information they have to provide me with and whether I can withhold payment until that information is forthcoming?
I will of course pay any fair and reasonable charge, but it is imposable to consider whether the charge is reasonable at this stage!!!
Many thanks
In late January I received a letter from our leasehold management company (Trinity Estates) containing the audited accounts for the year ending in July 2008.
The accounts indicated an overspend of £6462.60 which when apportioned to each of the flats is £215.42.
The flats themselves are only four years old and but for some minor works to one of the gateposts (when some idiot hit it with a car), there has, to my knowledge been no work at the flat.
The covering letter stated that they would take the money from all those with Direct Debits in March and the only explanation provided was that the money was needed as a result of "unforeseen works to the pumps" and the requirement of an annual maintenance contract.
I have sent two e-mails asking a series of questions about the works we are being charged for, including:
What are these "pumps"?
Where are they located?
What is their function?
Do they service each block of flats equally, or was the fault limited to one of the buildings on site (if so which one)?
What was the fault with the "pumps" which required such an expensive remedy?
Why is a maintenance contract required?
How many quotes did you obtain before agreeing a) the work b) the maintenance contract?
On what date were you aware of the fault and when was it rectified?
Was consideration given as to whether the cost of remedying this fault could be claimed against either the Buildings Insurance or such building guarantee's as may be in existence?
The company have thusfar ignored everything which has been sent to them.
Does anyone know what information they have to provide me with and whether I can withhold payment until that information is forthcoming?
I will of course pay any fair and reasonable charge, but it is imposable to consider whether the charge is reasonable at this stage!!!
Many thanks
0
Comments
-
Hi, you could take a look at http://www.lease-advice.org/ and look for the section on service charges. Or, phone them for advice - have done this a few times in the past and found them very friendly and helpful (and their advice is free!)0
-
Dear All,
In late January I received a letter from our leasehold management company (Trinity Estates) containing the audited accounts for the year ending in July 2008.
The accounts indicated an overspend of £6462.60 which when apportioned to each of the flats is £215.42.
The flats themselves are only four years old and but for some minor works to one of the gateposts (when some idiot hit it with a car), there has, to my knowledge been no work at the flat.
The covering letter stated that they would take the money from all those with Direct Debits in March and the only explanation provided was that the money was needed as a result of "unforeseen works to the pumps" and the requirement of an annual maintenance contract.
I have sent two e-mails asking a series of questions about the works we are being charged for, including:
What are these "pumps"?
Where are they located?
What is their function?
Do they service each block of flats equally, or was the fault limited to one of the buildings on site (if so which one)?
What was the fault with the "pumps" which required such an expensive remedy?
Why is a maintenance contract required?
How many quotes did you obtain before agreeing a) the work b) the maintenance contract?
On what date were you aware of the fault and when was it rectified?
Was consideration given as to whether the cost of remedying this fault could be claimed against either the Buildings Insurance or such building guarantee's as may be in existence?
The company have thusfar ignored everything which has been sent to them.
Does anyone know what information they have to provide me with and whether I can withhold payment until that information is forthcoming?
I will of course pay any fair and reasonable charge, but it is imposable to consider whether the charge is reasonable at this stage!!!
Many thanks
Old thread i know, but sounds very similar to my experience with Trinity Estates in Southampton.. youre not located in Southampton too are you??0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards