We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Are 75% schemes better than shared ownership?

We have found a house we like in the location we want and we can afford it if we use the shared purchase scheme, whereby you pay for 75% to start with, pay no interest or rent on the remaining 25% then pay for the 25% at some time in the next 10 years. You own the whole of your property from the outset but have to either sell or buy the extra 25% in the next 10 years.

The other suitable homes we can afford tend to be the shared ownership schemes where a housing association owns 10-50% and you own the rest. You pay rent on the other portion.

I know lots of people feel negatively about shared ownership, but if you havent got the money to buy a decent 4 bedroomed house such as we need, we feel it is better than renting for another few years, given that the cheapest 4 bed to rent is £800 pcm.

So Im not asking if you like these schemes are not, Im asking if anyone knows which one of the two is the best.
I have autistic spectrum disorder which is a social communication disorder so please be patient with me.

Comments

  • ciano125
    ciano125 Posts: 492 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Unfortunately the only person who will "know" which option is right is you! Personally I wouldnt take the shared ownership option because it doesnt suit my circumstances, but my circumstances will be different to yours. If you're buying a new build (which I presume it is) then just offer 70% of the asking price anyway (if you can afford the 75% this should be ok for you), state your position, ie first time buyer and ready to go, and you might be surprised.
  • aliwali
    aliwali Posts: 407 Forumite
    I was looking at this idea as well. We have seen a really nice 4 bedroom house that we like. It is a new build and is £249,000 so at 75% we would pay £186,750, which we could afford fairly easily (Although I would hope to knock a fair bit off that). The thing that worries me about these schemes is that you have to them find £70,000 in 10 years to own the rest. That is the bit I am not so sure about.

    So I guess my advice would be, get some money knocked off and have a clear idea at the outset how you are going to find the other 25% in the next 10 years. I would definately prefer this to a traditional shared ownership scheme.
    Fashion on a ration 0 of 66
  • Well, on the 75% shared equity, whilst we were viewing we managed to talk him down 10,000, but lets be honest, he might have dropped that anyway and not updated the details. What I would try for next is extras included eg carpets and whirlpool bath!

    I am also anxious about raising the other 25% in the next 10 years. I suppose you could take out a remortgage in 9 and a half years time. If house prices drop the developer gives up the first 10% - not quite sure how this works though. The worst thing for us is the fact that we arent particularly young: aged 49 and 50 so really we would be looking at a 15 yr mortgage.

    I still cant decide if this is better than just buying 75% and a housing association keeping 25% then paying rent on that. There is no compulsion to buy the extra, but you can do staircasing.
    I have autistic spectrum disorder which is a social communication disorder so please be patient with me.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.