We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Envirosearch report findings

I'm buying a new property which is nearing completion. The Envirosearch report has come back as PASSED but has identified that there is a low risk of "natural ground stability instability in the area within 50 metres of the centre of the search". My solicitor has obviously highlighted this as something that I may wish to follow up with a surveyor, although stressed that this is quite common and mentioned such factors as the fact that the property is newly constructed and is covered by NHBC. I talked to a surveyor who basically said there was not much more he could tell me over and above the information in the report. Further investigation would involve getting a structural engineer to look at foundations...but that seems crazy. I would like to think that the relevant controls and regulations required during the build would have identified any such hazards long before now. Being familiar with the area and the fact that the ground is chalk he couldn't see why there should be any subsidence issues. Has anyone else been faced with this issue? Are there any other checks I can perform?

Comments

  • Doozergirl
    Doozergirl Posts: 34,082 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    A "low risk" doesn't exactly sound like an issue to me. I'ts certainly not something I'd follow up on.

    Get on and buy the house if that's the worst an environmental report throws up. You can't not buy a house because theres a low risk of natural subsidence somewhere within 50 metres.
    Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
  • poppysarah
    poppysarah Posts: 11,522 Forumite
    Is it worth getting a more indepth explanation? Yes it costs money but so does rebuilding a house.

    Hulme new builds had lots of issues with land settling for a long time - only a few serious problems.
  • eur0
    eur0 Posts: 43 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    poppysarah wrote: »
    Is it worth getting a more indepth explanation? Yes it costs money but so does rebuilding a house.

    Hulme new builds had lots of issues with land settling for a long time - only a few serious problems.

    But where do you get a more indepth explanation? I'd like to know why the risk is "low" as opposed to (I assume "no hazard" - it doesn't say what the other possible risk values are).
  • Doozergirl
    Doozergirl Posts: 34,082 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    It's a new build. There is no point checking the foundations - they will have already been checked to see that they conform to building regulations and past that, the building just hasn't had time to settle yet.

    Does the diagram showing your house in the middle display where this area is?
    Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
  • eur0
    eur0 Posts: 43 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    No. The primary aim of the report is contamination so all potential markings are related to landfill, waste management, hazardous substances etc.. There is only one item marked (a 'Discharge Consent') on our radar but that's nearly 0.5Km away. This is the problem - I don't know how you find out the reasons behind the risk rating. I've seen a number of these reports now with low, low-moderate and moderate risk ratings for subsidence. The accompanying text is the same for all of them. I guess I can call 'Envirosearch' as a start.
  • We had one and if we had followed it then we would have never bought anywhere in the area. I reckon many houses are built near something that would come up on these searches and doubt we will bother for our new house.
    Nothing to see here :beer:
  • I think you will find is that they look at the geology of the area in general and then determine that that type of soil carries a "low" as opposed to "medium" or "high" risk. Also this may not take into account actual historic experience of subsidence or lack of it in the area - just that in general a particular kind of soil is more or less prone to instability.

    You can check with the people who produced the Environmental Report as to whether they have a "No Risk" or "Minimal Risk" category, and whether they have historic records of actual subsidence incidents from insurers (which I doubt). I suspect they may not have such categories or records, and "Low" is as good as you can get. I suspect your solicitor is scaremongering.
    RICHARD WEBSTER

    As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.
  • eur0
    eur0 Posts: 43 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thanks Richard. 'Scaremongering' is the term my surveyor used also. I suppose I can't really blame them - they are only highlighting something in the report. The problem is that I don't have enough information to form my own opinion.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.