We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
EA wants to qualify me before passing on any offer
Comments
-
poppysarah wrote: »It doesn't matter desperately if it is against DP once they know you can afford more they may well not accept your offer until you increase it.
Utter rubbish, it's not for the EA to accept the offer, it's the Vendor's decision based on what they can afford to accept and enables them to move/sell and/or whether it enables them to afford their next property!My home is usually the House Buying, Renting and Selling Forum where I can be found trying to (sometimes unsucessfully) prove that not all Estate Agents are crooks. With 20 years experience of Sales/Lettings and having bought and sold many of my own properties I've usually got something to say
Ignore......check!0 -
Reminds me of when we bought our first house. We had an offer letter from our Building Society which in our minds was enough proof that we had the funds in place. The vendors EA, Halifax, insisted that it wasn't good enough and that we needed a meeting with their IFA to "prove" our finances. We refused and there was quite a stand off for several days. Eventually, EA agreed to talk on the phone, which we did - they asked loads of questions, to which our reply was "I'd rather not say" - they carried on for question after question, our answer was the same. About half way through, they said "you're not going to tell us anything are you" to which I said "no you're right" but they carried on regardless. Eventually, once they had filled out their form, presumably writing "no comment" in every box, the call ended and then we could move on to buy the property. It was nothing but a form filling exercise, no doubt to try to persuade us to arrange the mortgage, life insurance, etc., through them, but no doubt they were happy to have been able to tick their stupid boxes for the statistics gathering!0
-
Just reading this thread through and wondered can you tell EA that you will show the vendor your AIP personally?
It seems if the EA or the MA within the EA sees what a potential buyer can afford then there is a conflict of interest. But if it is the vendor who is worried about a time waster, then as long as they see proof a mortgage has been offered in princple to a value that is inline with the property then any conflict of interest is removed.0 -
Just reading this thread through and wondered can you tell EA that you will show the vendor your AIP personally?
It seems if the EA or the MA within the EA sees what a potential buyer can afford then there is a conflict of interest. But if it is the vendor who is worried about a time waster, then as long as they see proof a mortgage has been offered in princple to a value that is inline with the property then any conflict of interest is removed.
Please explain why you think it's not a conflict of interest if the Vendor sees it and it is if the EA sees it?My home is usually the House Buying, Renting and Selling Forum where I can be found trying to (sometimes unsucessfully) prove that not all Estate Agents are crooks. With 20 years experience of Sales/Lettings and having bought and sold many of my own properties I've usually got something to say
Ignore......check!0 -
housesitter wrote: »I'm seeing some properties this weeken. FOr one of them the EA has already said that any offer would be subject to me coming in for a chat so that they can qualify me to see if I have the means to pay for the property.
Thanks
one EA i was seeing also had this on their website, all i had to show them was the certificat efrom the bank that said i could borrow (x insert amount that would be good for beating down the price of the property that i wanted as the bank provided me with several)....
when i asked this was to stop the vendor accepting my offer, and then not reaciving other offers as i would want the property removing market, and then i swan off to see if i can get a mortgage...
Stashbuster - 2014 98/100 - 2015 175/200 - 2016 501 / 500 2017 - 200 / 500 2018 3 / 500
:T:T0 -
well i'm assuming that the main worry is; if the EA sees what buyer can afford they might 'say' that the vendor has refused the first offer and so up the buyers offer and their own commission.
the point not established is if the vendor HAS asked for the buyer to be vetted.
I can see the other side which is if the vendors knows the buyer can afford more then they might decide to hang out for more regardless.
I was just trying to think of a way of removing the possible EA worry, but its all a gamble just depends which side of the fence you are on.0 -
well i'm assuming that the main worry is; if the EA sees what buyer can afford they might 'say' that the vendor has refused the first offer and so up the buyers offer and their own commission.
the point not established is if the vendor HAS asked for the buyer to be vetted.
I can see the other side which is if the vendors knows the buyer can afford more then they might decide to hang out for more regardless.
I was just trying to think of a way of removing the possible EA worry, but its all a gamble just depends which side of the fence you are on.
An EA, especially in the current climate, is not going to jeopardise a sale for the sake of a few pounds extra commission!My home is usually the House Buying, Renting and Selling Forum where I can be found trying to (sometimes unsucessfully) prove that not all Estate Agents are crooks. With 20 years experience of Sales/Lettings and having bought and sold many of my own properties I've usually got something to say
Ignore......check!0 -
MissMotivation wrote: »An EA, especially in the current climate, is not going to jeopardise a sale for the sake of a few pounds extra commission!
and in the current climate I'd doubt a vendor would jeopardise a sale for a few extra ££'s, but this thread clearly shows people are worried about its potential.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards