We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
legal insurance
iacoho
Posts: 1 Newbie
hi
is it wise to scrap legal insurance in favour of the chance its needed you go to the no win no fee solicitors
is it wise to scrap legal insurance in favour of the chance its needed you go to the no win no fee solicitors
0
Comments
-
I suggest you read this thread.
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=1442055
As long as you're careful to read what you sign up to with people like the above.
But be aware that you may have to pay some up front costs with "no-win no fee" and be careful to check what costs you are exposed to.
My MIL had to pay "disbursements" herself (whatever that is) and I am certain that her contract exposed her to losses, so I would urge you to be careful.
On the other hand you could pay £20 or so and not find yourself in a situation where you are exposed to big bills.
Your choice.
Personally I think for most people there are other areas of their budget where they could save more money with a lot less sacrifice.0 -
lisyloo - that has reminded me of something important on that other thread and I have re-posted!
OP - as lisyloo says and in my opinion it is usually worthwhile to take out the legal cover for the nominal sum involved. This is what I would say to friends and family. If you have a non-fault accident with a minimal uninsured loss claim it's unlikely a 'no win no fee' firm will take your claim, unless you wish to claim injury as this is where they make their £ from.0 -
You just reminded me of something too :-)
A few years ago my FIL hit a pedestrian in his car (pedestrian ran out in front of the car whilst training racing greyhounds).
Anyway my FIL had to pay a £120 excess on his insurance.
Eventually he got this back because he had legal cover.
The insurer paid it directly rather than pursuing the 3rd party as the recovery costs would probably exceed the payout.
However he would not have got this payout if he had not had legal cover for "uninsured losses".
A "no win no fee" company will not be interested in claiming £120 from a pedestrian on your behalf, they are only interested in claims that make them money (such as personal injury cases), so this is an anecdotal example of where "no win no fee" won't fit the bill.0 -
Disbursements means paying for things needed to pursue the claim - medical report etc. which is normally £400 or so, plus the cost of the notes.
I have legal expenses cover because I'm a cyclist and therefore at risk of having an accident.0 -
Like other posters have said I would rather save money in another direction than go without the legal cover for the small price it costs you.
My OH and I have never needed to use it but my 19 year old was involved in an accident 2 weeks ago and the Solicitor appointed by his Insurance company has been brilliant ....... a small price to pay for someone to deal with the legality and complications for you0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards