We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Escaping Penalties on Early Mortgage Redemption
John_M_Business
Posts: 565 Forumite
Hi ... I have a friend (yes, it is a friend... honest!) who has an offer on his current flat.
He's looking to buy with his wife but they can't find the flat they're looking for. There is a concern that the buyer will pull out.
I have suggested, given uncertainty in the current marketplace, that they could still sell, but not buy... but he's concerned as he got a discount mortgage and would have to pay back the entire discount if he redeemed early (this runs into thousands). The mortgage is 'due' in 2005.
So the question is this: could he legally sell his house, not pay back the mortgage, but place his cash into a high-yield interest account and use this to pay back the monthly payments until the mortgage ran out?
Obviously, the bank, if they get wind of the sale, will be asking for the money back - but could they legitimately force him to pay immediately and swallow the penalty?
If this is the case, does anyone have an ingenuous way around this? Are there any suggestions you can make?
Thanks in advance.
He's looking to buy with his wife but they can't find the flat they're looking for. There is a concern that the buyer will pull out.
I have suggested, given uncertainty in the current marketplace, that they could still sell, but not buy... but he's concerned as he got a discount mortgage and would have to pay back the entire discount if he redeemed early (this runs into thousands). The mortgage is 'due' in 2005.
So the question is this: could he legally sell his house, not pay back the mortgage, but place his cash into a high-yield interest account and use this to pay back the monthly payments until the mortgage ran out?
Obviously, the bank, if they get wind of the sale, will be asking for the money back - but could they legitimately force him to pay immediately and swallow the penalty?
If this is the case, does anyone have an ingenuous way around this? Are there any suggestions you can make?
Thanks in advance.
CarQuake / Ergo Digital
0
Comments
-
When I sold my house in 2002, there was a 22 day gap between selling and buying my current house. In this instance the mortgage remained portable and I incurred no penalty. This was with Abbey National but each lender probably has its own rules on the length of time allowed. I would guess a short period of time would be ok but I think they will have to check it out with their lender.0
-
The bank / building society (lender) will hold the deeds to your friends property - so it is extremely unlikely that your friend can "pay back the monthly payments until the mortgage runs out".
It would be wiser for your friend to include the lender in discussion. The lender can put a retention on the amount, probably wrapped around the fact that they will expect demand that your friends takes out their next mortgage with them also! If your friend signs that they will take their next mortgage (or more precisely port their existing one and add some) with the same lender I am sure your friend will find the lender extremely accommodating..! It may be prudent for your friend to check out the lenders rates for existing customers... the lender will expect the redemption penalty to be ported, but it may be possible for your friends to get the same rate....0 -
The BM approach referred to above is a common one.0
-
The Portman also were flexible (offering six months between selling and buying) as long as I re-started the same mortgage (the tie in etc., was obviously to be extended too).
Like averagepunter though I found a better deal elsewhere.
Fingers crossed your friend's lender will show similar common sense!0 -
Sure - but what if my friend doesn't want to buy in the near future? Perhaps he has got a good offer on his flat and wants to take a 2 year 'timeout' on the property market...
It looks like unless he ties himself to a binding contract he's going to have to swallow the penalty.CarQuake / Ergo Digital0 -
If its a good offer then its worth taking the penalty.
If not then IMHO he's best not to sell and carry on as is.
a simple sum....
if the rent for period till mortgage ends + early repayment charge is greater than the expected sale price at end of the mortgage period then bad move
(if its value increases then its def. a bad move)
If he feels house prices are going to drop by more than that much then good move!
Unfortuantely thats the nature of the beast and he just has to think of all the money he has saved up till now.
Basically what he pays back will be like having the variable rate rather than a discount.0 -
Sure - but what if my friend doesn't want to buy in the near future? Perhaps he has got a good offer on his flat and wants to take a 2 year 'timeout' on the property market...
It looks like unless he ties himself to a binding contract he's going to have to swallow the penalty.
Yes, because he tied himself to a binding contract when he bought the first mortgage.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards