We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Setting the size of a web page...

2

Comments

  • I didn't mean to start a fight. :D

    I just get so annoyed with people needlessly using tables especially when I have to change someone else's code. Screen readers can cope with properly laid out tables however they are essentially for data display. For example, forms do not need tables, they can go in an unordered list with <label for"input name"> and <input name=""> in each <li>
  • john_s wrote: »
    At the time of writing the source code for this thread has nearly 50 tables.


    Maybe we should club together and design Martin a new site
  • M4RKM
    M4RKM Posts: 5,132 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    i've just been playing around with a lovely css page that gives me a header, a left column, main section, and a right column, and then a footer

    now the left and right columns are fixed width, and the main section is the rest, depending on how big someones web browser is..

    the footer then appears in the right place on each page

    quite simple to do, and really really effective for a standards designed website, and works effectivley in all browsers.

    took me 15 minutes maybe to do the css, and an hour to edit the existing pages to take on this new css...

    simple really... but i do have a hatred of tables, as i've said, they are only good for tabluar data, or forms..
  • M4RKM
    M4RKM Posts: 5,132 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Maybe we should club together and design Martin a new site

    well the whole site is a bit outdated...

    *goes off to do some checking*

    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.moneysavingexpert.com&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0

    eeeek - 395 Errors, 113 warning(s)


    thankfully the site i've just been designing passes without an error or a warning.. woohoo!
  • PROLIANT
    PROLIANT Posts: 6,396 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Maybe we should club together and design Martin a new site
    Well you guy's are more savvy with th web design side of things, tell you what then, I will do the SQL Database and C# constructs if that will help. :D
    Since when has the world of computer software design been about what people want? This is a simple question of evolution. The day is quickly coming when every knee will bow down to a silicon fist, and you will all beg your binary gods for mercy.
  • markymoo wrote: »
    well the whole site is a bit outdated...

    *goes off to do some checking*

    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.moneysavingexpert.com&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0

    eeeek - 395 Errors, 113 warning(s)


    thankfully the site i've just been designing passes without an error or a warning.. woohoo!


    Yeah, I noticed that and had a little chuckle :D

    Mine has just validated as XHTML Transitional although it did get 4 warnings which are because I have labels for checkboxes appearing after the checkbox instead of before....How freakin stupid is that. Theyre still next to each other, but for some reason it moans at me.

    Anyone want to put the idea to Martin?
  • wyebird
    wyebird Posts: 755 Forumite
    OK...so which of you wants to be my mentor then? ;)
  • It depends on what you want to learn. I'd be happy to impart my useless knowledge on some unsuspecting foo..... oh wait....I can help :D
  • M4RKM
    M4RKM Posts: 5,132 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Yeah, I noticed that and had a little chuckle :D

    Mine has just validated as XHTML Transitional although it did get 4 warnings which are because I have labels for checkboxes appearing after the checkbox instead of before....How freakin stupid is that. Theyre still next to each other, but for some reason it moans at me.

    Anyone want to put the idea to Martin?

    aaah. well i carried on designing my site that i'm nearly finished with, and i got a few errors, mainly because i typed in 'onClick' for the javascript call, but XHTML doesn't like that as XHTML is all lower case... so i changed it to 'onclick' and woohoo, i'm validated again...

    M
  • martindow
    martindow Posts: 10,626 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Going back to the OP, I would think twice before making the page 100% width. On high resolution browsers this can create very long lines of text that are hard to read and can make layouts look strange. About 1000px width is fine in most browsers (very few people use 800px screens now) and centred it looks OK in wider screens.

    If you want the site to be exactly as you want it and want it to be easily viewed from mobile screens up to highest resolution monitors, you need browser sniffers to render different versions of your site (or link to different CSS files). Others will know how this is done - please don't ask me!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.