We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Is it safer to pay insurance monthly in case insurance co goes bust?
Comments
-
If an insurer goes bust (which is unlikely to happen) then the financial services compensation scheme would meat any domestic claims.0
-
IME, you usually pay well over the score in order to pay monthly. Which is not a good thing.0
-
If an insurer goes bust (which is unlikely to happen) then the financial services compensation scheme would meat any domestic claims.
Hi FS Expert. I have thanked you for your post, because you have answered some of the points raised by later posters, but OP did make in clear that they are after pensions advice.
OP, there is a case ongoing with a life and pensions insurer called Equitable Life. Here is a link to the BBC "fall from grace" article:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3219069.stm
I'm not a life and pensions expert, so I hope that one of the other posters who knows the subject will look at this thread. If you don't get any joy, re-post your question with the word "pension" in the title and I am sure they will take notice.In the beginning, the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry and was widely regarded as a bad move.The late, great, Douglas Adams.0 -
where did the OP either on topic or on first post say pension? Oh sorry in post 9. Yes agree with you Oscar the Grouch. Repost it and make it clear it is about pension in topic / first message.0
-
Well done facingthefuture for asking a perfectly sensible question.
It seems to me that if there is a possibility of a company going broke, whether insurance company or whatever, then it makes sense to pay monthly so that effectively you are more or less only paying for that amount of the 'product' used.Be ALERT - The world needs more LERTS0 -
Utter utter nonsense.Well done facingthefuture for asking a perfectly sensible question.
It seems to me that if there is a possibility of a company going broke, whether insurance company or whatever, then it makes sense to pay monthly so that effectively you are more or less only paying for that amount of the 'product' used.
How are you going to determine the likelihood of a company going bust? I imagine there's a POSSIBILITY of this happening to any company, however remote. By your rationale it would make more sense to pay more to insure with a company who is less likely to go under. Whilst I don't necessarily disagree with this idea, it's not at the top of my list of priorities.
:hello:0 -
if you pay your insurance annually and use a credit card then you should be able to claim against the credit card company if the insurance company went bust.3 stone down, 3 more to go0
-
A positive contribution noelphobic thank you. an idea I had overlooked!Be ALERT - The world needs more LERTS0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards