We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Rechargeable batteries - saving money?
timestar
Posts: 210 Forumite
in Techie Stuff
Has anybody actually done the maths on whether using a battery charger and rechargeable batteries does actually save money. When you factor in the initial cost of the charger and batteries, and the cost of the electricity for each charging session, is there really a saving?
0
Comments
-
Battery chargers don't use up that much electricity, maybe a few pence per charge, so I'm sure they do work out cheaper.
You could work it out yourself though; look at the electricity usage on your meter, start recharging some batteries, then look at it again. Subtract one from the other and that's how much electricity the charger uses. Once the batteries are charged, work out how much time it took, then you can work out how many kilowatts it takes to recharge the batteries. Then just multiply that by the cost of your electricity per kilowatt.0 -
Factor in the capacity of the rechargeables, as the cheapest ones usually run down pretty quickly 2500mah is reasonable for AA size0
-
Or look at the kilowatt rating on the transformer. That will give you a maximum figure, working from that will give you a reasonable over-estimate, which is what you want once you factor in the fact that you won't always stop using it once they're fully charged, so the transformer will be generating heat, "wasting" energy. (not really, it heats the room, saving the central heating from coming on; conservation of energy thwarts most of these green arguments)Ubuntu is an ancient African word, meaning: 'I can't configure Debian'.0
-
Rechargeable will be cheaper in the long run, provided you can be bothered to recharge them every time. The usual snag is that they have a lower voltage than the non-rechargeable ones - which can occasionally matter.0
-
The other issue to factor in is with traditional rechargeables over time they loose their charge if they are not used, so you end up having to charge them again. There are newer (more expensive) types that are more resistant to this.0
-
-
And in everyday terms, I stands for current, or the rate of flow of charge.Ubuntu is an ancient African word, meaning: 'I can't configure Debian'.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

