📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

0% to 36%

My son had a credit card with the RBS at zero%. The credit card accounts were moved to another company that is charging a crippling 36%. Is this allowed or legal?

Many thanks for your advise.

Comments

  • cifpower
    cifpower Posts: 6,502 Forumite
    yes it is both allowed and legal. What made you think that it wasn't?
  • NickX
    NickX Posts: 3,046 Forumite
    Solution : Get a new 0% card and move the balance across.

    OK there will be a fee of around 3%, but bye bye to 36% ;)
  • stevsand
    stevsand Posts: 56 Forumite
    cifpower wrote: »
    yes it is both allowed and legal. What made you think that it wasn't?
    Your right but your atittude stinks.
  • cifpower
    cifpower Posts: 6,502 Forumite
    stevsand wrote: »
    Your right but your atittude stinks.
    No attitude apart from a quizzical one
  • rodent
    rodent Posts: 292 Forumite
    stevsand wrote: »
    Your right but your atittude stinks.


    UH oh ....we are not off to a good start, here are we ?


    The Rodent
    My posts are my opinion which is neither right nor wrong.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,124
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    yes it is both allowed and legal. What made you think that it wasn't?

    Well, I would have expected the legal contract to have some sort of bearing.
    Although these things often have clauses that allow them to be varied with notice.

    I think it's quite a reasonable question given that it's a legal agreement/contract.

    I suspect there are terms and conditions to the effect that the lender can change the rate whenever and however they wish.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    usually (always?) 0% cards are for a specific time period or for a specific balance.
    what were the T&Cs of your son's card.
    Have they been broken..if so I'm sure he would have a valid complaint. If however, the 0% period has simply run out then he would have a much less substantial case.
    Perhaps you could provide more details.
    EU tariff on agricultual product 12.2%
    some dairy products 42.1% cloths 11.4%
    EU Clinical Trials Directive stops medical advances
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 606K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.