We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

What to offer?

2»

Comments

  • kettlefish
    kettlefish Posts: 333 Forumite
    Sorry for the lack of info, as I said I'm completely new to this!

    Thanks for all your helpful replies.

    The houses further down the road, the lower numbers, are more in the chalet bungalow style, and generally 2-bed with small gardens. The house we like is number 15. The even numbers are almost all bungalows. I have read somewhere that the 2004 prices are about what we're back to, they have had uPVC throughout since buying it but not much else other than decorating and keeping it in working order, looking nice...... House next door is a 4-bed for £169,950.

    With that in mind we will look round the other house on the same road, and two on the cul-de-sacs opposite, really just to clear things up a little, but will probably end up offering around £140-£145k.

    Thanks again for all your helpful responses :)
  • kettlefish
    kettlefish Posts: 333 Forumite
    Fingers crossed they don't use MSE! Never thought of that.:eek:
  • Good luck kettlefish.

    I think it's always nice to get a bargain or to sell something for a profit. It's also nice to treat people how you would wish to be treated.

    That said, your cash is a strong hand and my advice would be to start the offer at £135K working up in £1K or £2k increments to a maximum of £140K.

    It will be worth less this time next year.

    At £600 I'd rent. I certainly would not pay £130K for a house to let at £600.

    Good luck.

    GG
    There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Of no use whatsoever .... Number 15 sold for £47,000 in August 1995.

    I just thought I'd mention it.
  • Where did you find that PN?

    GG
    There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.
  • AMG2B
    AMG2B Posts: 83 Forumite
    Hi - me again! I think this looks like a really nice house and would probably go in with an offer of 135 - 140k given your cash status etc and hope to get it under 145k. Best of luck :)
    Everything will be ok in the end, if everything's not ok then it's not the end :)
  • beingjdc wrote: »
    If you're staying a long time, then it's worth what it's worth to you as a home.

    For a more formal calculation, similar properties seem to be about £600 a month to rent, and long-term fixed mortgages are around 5%.

    On that basis, a house like that is "worth" £144k. Subtract a bit for costs you have when owning but not when renting (eg buildings insurance) and you're back at the 2004 price previously mentioned.

    Funny old world, eh.

    I don't agree with the 'as its a house to buy as a home, its ok to overpay' message, that seems to be banded around here, replacing one of the many cliched HIP quotes that were said in its time.

    Buying now is fine if you really want to contribute a higher proportion of your future earnings to mortgage interest, and have less to enjoy. Or in this case, you really want to waste £x0,000's of your inheritance. In a year, prices are going to fall by at the very least 10% of the market price, not the advertised price (as they kept higher than actual market). So if its actually worth £140k today, expect a loss of at least £14k this year, then what about the 2010? and 2011? How will you feel if they drop by 20% this year, and you lose £30k of your inheritance?

    If I was in your position with cash in the bank, I wouldn't buy now, because you are essentially agreeing to pay nearly an entire life-times worth of rent/mortgage repayments for an asset which is overvalued, and almost certain to fall much much further, and and recovery is very uncertain.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.