We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Supervising a learner driver

Can someone please give me advise on the following situation. My friend who is learning to drive had bought their own car and has got comprehensive insurance for learner drivers. They want me to sit with them in the car- I have had my full license for over 3 years and am insured TPFT on my own car. As they have their own insurance on their own car is it legal for me to sit in their car whilst they drive it?
«1

Comments

  • It might be worth phoning both insurance companies, they should klnow the answer to this...

    HTH
    M2 x
  • BruceyBonus
    BruceyBonus Posts: 1,143 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    You would need to have minimum third party to drive the learner's car. The supervisor needs to be able to take over the car in the case of the learner not being able to, so insurance is required. Adding a full licence holder of over 3 years to a learner's policy shouldn't make too much of a difference in premium.
  • the OP is asking if he needs any insurance to be a passenger with the learner driving the vehicle - no you don't. doesn't even matter if you don't own a car or even aren't included on any kind of policy:j :j :j

    all that matters is that you're experienced enough to qualify as a valid supervisor - can't remember the requirements, maybe someone else on the site could help on that one
  • Cazza
    Cazza Posts: 1,165 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    You need to be at least 21 too, as well as having had your licence for 3 years
  • Cazza wrote: »
    You need to be at least 21 too, as well as having had your licence for 3 years


    thanks Cazza - for my learning, is that the only criteria?

    for example, if you have your license for 3 years but have say 3 claims and 9 points is it still ok?

    Also, feels odd if say i been driving for 3 years but only a 1.1 fiat uno for me to be considered ok as an experienced driver if the learner is driving a 4 litre porsche 911?
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 50,681 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    I can't see a learner getting insurance on a 4 litre anything, never mind a porsche.

    If you have a valid licence for 3 years and are over 21, you can sit with a learner. Your own claim history is irrelevant. If you weren't insured to drive the vehicle in question, you would have to pull over and wait for someone else if the learner got into a situation where they couldn't continue to drive.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • silvercar wrote: »
    I can't see a learner getting insurance on a 4 litre anything, never mind a porsche.

    If you have a valid licence for 3 years and are over 21, you can sit with a learner. Your own claim history is irrelevant. If you weren't insured to drive the vehicle in question, you would have to pull over and wait for someone else if the learner got into a situation where they couldn't continue to drive.


    fair enough maybe my porsche example was extreme, but the point i made still makes sense i think?

    surely it's not right that the same rule applies regardless of the "experienced" drivers previous vehicle compared to new vehicle, and also claims / convs history

    i know i'd be furious if a learner crashed into me driving a 2 litre £25k BMW and i found out that the experienced driver had only ever driven a fiesta, was 22 years old, had 2 previous accidents and 2 speeding convictions - isn't that just common sense?:confused::confused::confused:
  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    You seem to be suggesting that the law is an a*ss. But we've heard that before.
  • Quentin wrote: »
    You seem to be suggesting that the law is an a*ss. But we've heard that before.


    you think all laws in this country are perfect?:confused::confused: i don't


    from your post i'm not sure if you agree with my comment or not?
  • Quote
    Quote Posts: 8,042 Forumite
    i know i'd be furious if a learner crashed into me driving a 2 litre £25k BMW and i found out that the experienced driver had only ever driven a fiesta, was 22 years old, had 2 previous accidents and 2 speeding convictions - isn't that just common sense?:confused::confused::confused:
    You're actually ridiculous. You know that, don't you?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.