We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Some of you are vultures
Options
Comments
-
Do you really think the other lot would have been any better? There isnt much choice. Having two or three bad choices doesn't exactly amount to a lot of say in the scheme of things.
I admit, I agree with you there - I personally thought the other lot would have been even worse; that's why I voted this lot of clowns in.
But whether I'll give them the benefit of the doubt a third time is highly unlikely.
Shame we don't live a 3 party state - I'd vote for Vince Cable - the only leading politician who appears to know his !!!! from his elbow - but sadly he won't get in.
Revolution anyone?0 -
I admit, I agree with you there - I personally thought the other lot would have been even worse; that's why I voted this lot of clowns in.
But whether I'll give them the benefit of the doubt a third time is highly unlikely.
Shame we don't live a 3 party state - I'd vote for Vince Cable - the only leading politician who appears to know his !!!! from his elbow - but sadly he won't get in.
Revolution anyone?
Hear, hear. I'm up for it today. Now.The forest would be very silent if no birds sang except for the birds that sang the best0 -
lostinrates wrote: »I have a question...is it genrally considered poor form, to look at previous posts in intrnt discussion? I did this (actually not by looking at previous posts but reading a post in another thread and realising its strength in my point of debate) th otherday and caused similar hurt to the person, which was most certainly not my intention. so while it seems perfectly reasonable for me to do, (and I can think of plausible and just reasons why things ar discussed differently under different headings) I now wonder if its generally considered poor form?
I hope and pray that when the old Bill come dahn my gaff, and try to pin a ten stretch on me that she ain't stood opposite for the prosecution.0 -
-
DirectDebacle wrote: »0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards