We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Are house prices really going down?

18910111214»

Comments

  • dopester
    dopester Posts: 4,890 Forumite
    mitchaa wrote: »
    If they put it on for £192k it is very very unlikely that they will sell at the full £192k hence the price of £225k. Sellers should not be footing the bill for potential further drops in the housing market, that is for the buyers to deal with.

    No. It is not for buyers to deal with. That is why I'm not buying now mitchaa. I want sellers to swallow the reductions in what they once assumed was "permanent values", and not bank their easy HPI capital gains of the hyper-boom at my cost. Has to be so in the new world where financial reality has smashed through and nearly killed the banks.

    They might not have any interest at £225K, with potential buyers reluctant to play the tiresome game where they have to put lower offers in to the owners to get to a more realistic value. Whereas the seller who undercuts to a more sensible £192K gets more attention from the market and maybe sells sooner and nearer their price.

    6 months later your guy reduces to 192K, and would have to be lower offers again to come down to just under £175K so no stamp duty. Tricky I suppose.
  • davsidipp
    davsidipp Posts: 11,514 Forumite
    dopester wrote: »
    Full article continues here...
    nice area sevenoaks but the house must have been overpriced to start of with.as for the lady what a fool earning good money to dwindle it away like that trying to keep up with the jones.
    Before you point fingers,make sure your hands are clean !;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.