We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Tenants Leaving Agreement Early
Comments
-
anybody think this would be acceptable to send out?
On inspection of the property today, it is apparent that the condition is not as you found it when your agreement began in March 2008.
As per your signed agreement, you are obliged to leave the property in the condition in which it was in when you began your tenancy agreement. You have not met this condition and as a result the property will need to return to the standard that it was in March 2008. The main points of concern are:
- Most rooms smell of cigarettes and paintwork is now yellow
- Paintwork has been chipped on the banister and some door frames (during furniture removal?)
- Front and rear gardens have dog excrement that has not been removed
To return the property to as near to original condition as possible it will need to be cleaned and painted. You will be liable for any costs associated with the cleaning / re-painting. Currently this amount is £450.00
As a gesture of goodwill I am prepared to accept four monthly payments of £112.50 until the costs have been recovered. I should inform you that if no written response is received within 14 days then small claims proceedings to recover the costs will be lodged.0 -
Make sure you read the meters today!!0
-
Edinburghlass wrote: »Make sure you read the meters today!!
Already done Edinburgh Lass! Seems they have managed to break the toilet though, God only knows how.
Still finding things as I'm going along!
0 -
Already done Edinburgh Lass! Seems they have managed to break the toilet though, God only knows how.
Still finding things as I'm going along! 
It can be soul destroying, been there and got the t-shirt
One other thing, check any furniture as they had dogs and its quite likely to be smelly and need a good clean too.0 -
Yep there is no furniture in the house, but dog hairs seem to get everywhere right!?! I've got carpet cleaners going in tomorrow. I intend to give them the bill when I've finished (previous tenants that is).0
-
Oh dear...it is a steep learning curve, but on the positive side they are out!
Don't send them your letter just yet. Get a few written quotes to include with it. Even if your friend is cleaning, get him/her to write you an estimate at the going rate, & to estimate how many hours cleaning, & of what. Personally I'd call a big company in to do it, if it's that dirty & you need it done by Monday, you need more than one professional cleaner in. Ditto for the carpet cleaners - get a quote in writing.
I also would not offer them any concession to pay in installments. Pay up or go to court...you have offered enough concessions!0 -
Hi Sooz. Yep steep is the word! and yes, at least they are out.
I'll make some calls tomorrow and see if I can get quotes etc. Although the other people have already asked if they can start moving stuff in tomorrow, and I've had to say no. Its not so much that its dirty, but the smell of smoke and dogs is very noticeable, so in that sense it is dirty!
Even tho I knew they were smokers, surely they should still have to put the place back to the condition it was in? Maybe I'm out of luck and they don't!
0 -
Erm, not sure you've got the jist of the thread hameshawani......0
-
I'm going to go ahead and assume that was directed at me.hameshawani wrote: »I hope youll be happy in your new home oon

Thanks!0 -
anybody think this would be acceptable to send out?
On inspection of the property today, I visited the house today, and it is apparent that the condition is not as you found it when your agreement began in March 2008. the house is dirty and you have caused damage during your tenancy.
As per your signed agreement, According to the tenancy agreement you signed, you are obliged to leave the property house in the condition in which it was in in the same condition as it was in when you began your tenancy agreement. You have not met this condition and as a result the property will need to return to the standard that it was in March 2008 and therefore I need to have some work done to put the house in the same condition as it was in March 2008.. The main points of concern are My main concerns are:- Most rooms smell of cigarettes and the paintwork is now yellow
- Paintwork has been chipped on the banister and some door frames (during furniture removal?)
- Front and rear gardens have dog excrement that has not been removed
As a gesture of goodwill I am prepared to accept four monthly payments of £112.50 until the costs have been recovered. I should inform you that if no written response is received within 14 days then small claims proceedings to recover the costs will be lodged.
You will need to show them proof of the costs, and a breakdown.
I've deleted bits and re-written them in your letter, the deleted bits in blue and the new bits in red.
A common mistake people make in legal-type letters is to use pompous or unnecessary language. You don't need to. Keep it simple and straight-forward, "house" instead of "property", active, not passive clauses....much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards