We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Buying a repossession - weird clause in contract

1235

Comments

  • neilmk
    neilmk Posts: 12 Forumite
    I think my biggest worry in all this is signing the contracts, letting our solicitors exchange and then for some reason our mortgage lendor turning round and saying that they will not release the funds.

    Although they have been written to informing them of the situation with the deeds, at present they have not replied so im reluctant to return signed contracts to the solicitor for safe keeping just in case our mortgage lendor does not approve. I would rather wait until they have in writing from our mortgage lendor that everything is approved before we hand over signed contracts. Our solicitor has said that they will not exchange the contracts until this information is confirmed but still, im gonna hold off for my own peace of mind.
  • This is interesting..

    SOap-23-83-dntw.html
  • Evee2000
    Evee2000 Posts: 217 Forumite
    PPI Party Pooper
    MegS wrote: »
    HIPs are not required to include planning permissions etc only local authority search and drainage search. When our clients have bought repo's it is usual that a lot of information is missing and that the solicitors acting for the lender will not pay to provide any such information. The lenders are usually of the opinion that if you want the property then you do all the extras as they don't care whether the property is sold now or later in auction. We have also had the Transfer clause before. Something new is the inspecting of the property after completion. Can't help you there I'm afraid, may be worth querying that one. As it is only two days (I presume you mean in the same week for reconnection of services) between exchange deadline and reconnection then you may be able to delay things but be prepared for the property to be pulled if you do decide to brazen it out. Depends how hard nosed the solicitors are, I'm sure the lender would be reasonable as what you are paying is undoubtedly more than they are probably going to get at auction. As I said depends on the solicitors.

    Sorry, this is incorrect. A HIP must provide details of planning permission, building regulations and highways information - some Local Authorities will refuse to provide this information without an additional charge (nevertheless it is still a requirement to include it in the HIP). Along with a drainage and water search and official title documentation. If you know that your HIP is missing this information, the HIP is not fully compliant. Many Local Authorities have online portals where a check of planning consents can be made, as a belt and braces approach to confirming your HIP is correct.
  • Premier_2
    Premier_2 Posts: 15,141 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    neilmk wrote: »
    Thanks Jenner, our problem is the 28 day deadline is up on Wednesday, and the contract states across the top in bold that NO AMENDMENTS WILL BE AGREED. So it seems we accept what they are saying or walk away...
    This is the norm when a lender is selling the property. Any amendments are extremely difficult to get agreed ... but there is nothing stopping your solicitor trying.

    After all, if the terms of the sale are so onerous as not to be acceptable to anyone then they'll have to amend them if they want to sell. Some people have already stated they wouldn't be happy with such terms and I don't think I would be either.

    Follow the advice of your solicitor. If you're unhappy with the terms and your solicitor advises you not to agree to them, then walk away from the deal - you'll find another property you like without such onerous terms attached.
    "Now to trolling as a concept. .... Personally, I've always found it a little sad that people choose to spend such a large proportion of their lives in this way but they do, and we have to deal with it." - MSE Forum Manager 6th July 2010
  • Catti
    Catti Posts: 372 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Although the Local Search gives information about planning matters, it will not contain actual copies of any consents.
  • Evee2000
    Evee2000 Posts: 217 Forumite
    PPI Party Pooper
    Catti wrote: »
    Although the Local Search gives information about planning matters, it will not contain actual copies of any consents.

    Yes, thats correct. All that is needed is the planning reference and a description of the work requested/undertaken.
  • neilmk
    neilmk Posts: 12 Forumite
    Hi, by way of update our solicitor is requesting new copies of the planning permission, the warranty from NHBC and has submitted local searches.
    Does this mean that if we come to resell the house in the future the HIP pack would then be complete?
  • I've heard of this once before - in that case someone's ashes had been scattered in the garden. I've always beleived the dead can't hurt you - only the living!!
  • Evee2000
    Evee2000 Posts: 217 Forumite
    PPI Party Pooper
    neilmk wrote: »
    Hi, by way of update our solicitor is requesting new copies of the planning permission, the warranty from NHBC and has submitted local searches.
    Does this mean that if we come to resell the house in the future the HIP pack would then be complete?

    It would depend on when you remarketed the property. Whilst the HIP is valid for the life of the existing marketing of the property, if the property is removed from the market, the HIP will only be valid for 1 year. If the property is remarketed within the year, the HIP will again no longer be timebound. The searches on the other hand may no longer be accepted by your buyers lender if they are over 6 months old - however, you, as the vendor, will have complied with the HIP regulations and it will be up to the buyer to update the searches.
  • Hi

    How did things go with this? We are also buying a repossession and my solicitor called today to say that there is an unusual clause in the contract about accessing the property after completion. She has gone back to ask for it to be removed as she considers it odd. Did you ever find out why your similar clause was required?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.