We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
banking query
shelly608
Posts: 5 Forumite
Hi,
Does anyone know if it is right for a bank to process an unsigned payment slip ?
We had to pay via the old fashioned imprint way the other week for our purchases, as the chip n pin was down. The staff failed to ask for a signature, but the bank processed without checking with us.
The same bank that won't talk to my husband with out his own pin number for our joint account.
just a slight inconsistency in security policies.
Does anyone know if it is right for a bank to process an unsigned payment slip ?
We had to pay via the old fashioned imprint way the other week for our purchases, as the chip n pin was down. The staff failed to ask for a signature, but the bank processed without checking with us.
The same bank that won't talk to my husband with out his own pin number for our joint account.
just a slight inconsistency in security policies.
0
Comments
-
The Bank don't process 'the payment slip' .... they don't even see it.
It's the 'merchant acquirer' working for the retailer who keys the data into the system from the piece of paper.If you want to test the depth of the water .........don't use both feet !0 -
i am still intrigued as to why no signature is required, when card is swiped you have to sign, chip n pin, pin number entered. Cheques need to be signed. Surely it should have been questioned. ? Makes it quite easy for fraudsters.0
-
I'm assuming a retailer hasn't collected a signature for a transaction where chip and pin was unavailable.
The transaction will still get processed in the usual way and will be charged to your account. The slip itself will remain with the retailer.
If a customer claimed that the card had been used fraudulently and the retailer was unable to show the signature, the bank would reimburse you and charge the retailer for the loss.
It is absolutely the retailer's responsibility to deal with the transaction properly.
If you actually reported the card missing and shouted "fraud" there's a reasonable chance you'd get the money back for the transaction.
Equally, that in itself would be fraudulent and you open yourself up to a charge of theft or deception which could land you in prison!0 -
What that guy said.
With a card purchase, the signature slip is not returned to the bank as with a cheque, as it is not the instrument of payment. The payment is not reliant on the signature being returned to the bank, it's reliant on the card number being presented (along with any other details the card processor asks for).
As for fraudsters, very little fraud actually happens through this channel - most card related fraud is on cloned cards, which are easier to pull off. Reason being that copied cards don't tend to actually look like the bank's card, they're just bits of regular old plastic, which get noticed in shops.What would William Shatner do?0 -
Thank you for your helpful replies. More helpful than my own bank.
Mx0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards