We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Need to get a good scanner - any advice

Wanting to buy myself a scanner, mostly for scanning photos. Have tried them on a friend's HP all in one and while they scanned well to computer, they printed really badly. Have also tried someone's epson RX580 with brilliant results when printed.

Currently have Canon Pixma ip4300 however dont find it great for printing high quality photos, and usually end up using tesco photo printing to get the best results - as i print a lot of enlargements

So either i buy a scanner and continue using tescos to print the photos
Or i get a good all in one so i can scan and print myself.
Any recommendations of the best quality scanners/all in ones?

Since i want really good quality dont expect it to be cheap - planning to save up for it - could pay maybe £100-200. But since Im paying that, I want to make sure I'm getting the best i can.

Comments

  • BillScarab
    BillScarab Posts: 6,027 Forumite
    Persoanlly I'd get them printed at Tesco or wherever. Printing at home is generally more expensive and more hit and miss.

    If you have negatives of the photos the best results wil lbe obtained by getting a negative scanner but they tend to be pricier.
    It's my problem, it's my problem
    If I feel the need to hide
    And it's my problem if I have no friends
    And feel I want to die


  • Jake'sGran
    Jake'sGran Posts: 3,269 Forumite
    BillScarab wrote: »
    Persoanlly I'd get them printed at Tesco or wherever. Printing at home is generally more expensive and more hit and miss.

    If you have negatives of the photos the best results wil lbe obtained by getting a negative scanner but they tend to be pricier.

    I think this is good advice as I noticed a few weeks ago in The Sunday Times technical section they mentioned that commercial photos were cheaper and better quality than anything you can do with your PC/printer.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.