We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Deferred Equity. To Buy Or Not To Buy

2»

Comments

  • Incisor
    Incisor Posts: 2,271 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    poppysarah wrote: »
    Another bizarre idea - does it not strike the victims as a scam? ...
    No, they are grateful to those ripping them off, which is why they are victims.
    After the uprising of the 17th June The Secretary of the Writers Union
    Had leaflets distributed in the Stalinallee Stating that the people
    Had forfeited the confidence of the government And could win it back only
    By redoubled efforts. Would it not be easier In that case for the government
    To dissolve the people
    And elect another?
  • dylan8 wrote: »
    I wouldnt advise anyone against this. Its not like a shared equity where you have to pay rent. Ive spoke to the bank and will have no problems remortgaging. Ive had a free £26000 loan for a year technically.

    Technically speaking, you now owe £136k on a house worth £110k. So you are £25k down in a year.
    ...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.
  • There seems to be alot of bad feeling towards these schemes. I have not been ripped off . I looked alot into this before i bought. The whole country is suffering from the house price drop. As the price has dropped the builders 15% has dropped too, so i owe them less. i think people are geeting blinkered thinking i pay rent on their 15%. i do not. If i wanted to sell now, the 15% would be payed back from the sale (dont forget my mortgage is less in the first place!) or long term im buying it for less. Look at the scheme, not the state of the country.
  • Im not a first time buyer. How is it overpriced?
  • poppysarah
    poppysarah Posts: 11,522 Forumite
    Do you owe them less?
  • wymondham
    wymondham Posts: 6,356 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Mortgage-free Glee!
    dylan8 wrote: »
    If i wanted to sell now, the 15% would be payed back from the sale

    Not when you're in negative equity it won't.

    This is the problem, and the reason why lots of people are sceptical of these 'easy' ways to buy:

    Whenever you wish to move on, you'll have all the usual costs and expenses, plus you'll also have to allow for handing over 15% of the sale price back to the builder. This is a problem when you want to move up as the scheme now acts against you by making this process much harder. The scheme however has fulfuilled it's single purpose - allowing the builder to sell the property that otherwise would not have sold.

    For the past year you've effectively only been paying for 85% of your house - you avoided the 15% when you moved in, but you can't avoid it when you sell - it's just been deferred. Think of the 15% as an interest free loan that needs to be repaid when you sell.

    The best thing you can do is to save as much as you can and/or overpay to reduce your mortgage. Hopefully by not paying the full mortgage for the year you've already made a good start on your savings, and you should continue this. The saving grace here is at least you have a house - if it were a flat the situation would be much worse.

    What size deposit did you use when you purchased the house?
  • any scheme that isnt a straightforward purchase of 100% of your home means you lose out in some way.

    with this one you get a small advantage at purchase time, but a bigger disadvantage at sale time.

    perhaps make a very low offer on the 15%?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.