We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Started on 1st working day of the month, but not paid fully?

I started a new job on Mon 3rd Nov, so the 1st working day of the month. However, my pay has been reduced by 2 days since:

"Your annual salary has been divided by 365 days to arrive at a daily rate. As you started on November 3rd, 2 days have been deducted from your monthly salary"

I don't think this is fair at all. I have worked the full working month. I work Mon - Fri.

Can I have your comments please.

THanks
«134

Comments

  • Andy_L
    Andy_L Posts: 13,091 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You started work on the 3rd, they paid you from the 3rd. Perfectly fair.
  • but I have worked all the required working days in that month, and been paid less :confused::o :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
  • Your pay is spread out over non-working days too. If your contract states you start on 3rd then they start paying you from the 3rd.
  • McKneff
    McKneff Posts: 38,857 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I dont think its fair that the annual salary should be divided by 365.
    Surely it should be divided by the number of working days,
    well, that my opinion anyway
    make the most of it, we are only here for the weekend.
    and we will never, ever return.
  • Sounds bonkers to me.
    Unless you are actually going to work all 365 days of the year, they should certainly not use this as a method of calculation.
    Did they not quote an annual salary, weekly wage, hourly rate? If the job is a Mon-Fri 8 hours/day and you started on mon 3/11, they should absolutely have paid you as though that was day one.
    Given that we are are not yet t the end of the month, have you also been given a prediction of what you will be paid? If they are deducting 2 days (1 & 2/11), then they should be paying you for the other 28 (to 30/11) x daily rate at the end of the month if that's payday.
    Blonde: Unemployed: Bankrupt.
    What do I know?
    :confused:
  • Fluffi
    Fluffi Posts: 324 Forumite
    I think it partly depends on whether its necessary to work weekends/bank holidays to meet deadlines in your job, without overtime pay. In which case I think dividing by 365 seems fair because you've only been employed since the 3rd, so it does not make sense for you to get the same money as someone else in the company who may have worked on the 1st and/or 2nd November despite those days being "non-working days".

    I wouldn't be happy if a new starter on the 3rd got the same salary payment as me if I'd been with the company since the previous month!
  • There may also be ocassions when dividing annual pay by 365 works in your favour - e.g. if you ever need to take a couple of days off unpaid?
  • Got2change wrote: »
    Sounds bonkers to me.
    Unless you are actually going to work all 365 days of the year, they should certainly not use this as a method of calculation.
    Did they not quote an annual salary, weekly wage, hourly rate? If the job is a Mon-Fri 8 hours/day and you started on mon 3/11, they should absolutely have paid you as though that was day one.
    Given that we are are not yet t the end of the month, have you also been given a prediction of what you will be paid? If they are deducting 2 days (1 & 2/11), then they should be paying you for the other 28 (to 30/11) x daily rate at the end of the month if that's payday.

    Yes annual salary quoted, paid monthly. Mon- Fri 8 hrs a day. and I will be working all of next week of course to earn it! So I wil have worked all the required days.

    Thanks for your comments so far (all of you)

    To say I am livid, is an understatement.
  • Fluffi wrote: »
    I think it partly depends on whether its necessary to work weekends/bank holidays to meet deadlines in your job, without overtime pay. In which case I think dividing by 365 seems fair because you've only been employed since the 3rd, so it does not make sense for you to get the same money as someone else in the company who may have worked on the 1st and/or 2nd November despite those days being "non-working days".

    I wouldn't be happy if a new starter on the 3rd got the same salary payment as me if I'd been with the company since the previous month!

    Nope not required to work bank holidays or weekends. I would get overtime if I do.
  • tuggy12
    tuggy12 Posts: 1,314 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I've never heard of such a crazy system.
    So if they arrive at a daily rate by dividing your annual salary by 365, does this mean you will only get paid for 28 days in Feb, 30 days in Sept and 31 days in July etc.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.