We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Oops
Comments
-
My LIBOR rate is bigger than yours, link from the Times relating to 1981, have look at the Libor rate.
http://archive.timesonline.co.uk/tol/viewArticle.arc?articleId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1981-03-11-17-005&pageId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1981-03-11-17
What was the spread from the official BoE base rate like though? I'd guess LIBOR was within a few tens of bps of base rate.--
Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.0 -
It's going to be interesting to see how things pan out.
My feeling is that we were 'due' a recession when the dot com bubble burst and that it was avoided by a little bit of luck really. The monetary stimulus that was given to the economy by slashing interest rates should have caused inflation but that was avoided due to the Chinese flooding the West with very cheap consumer goods. Where the added money did show up as inflation was in asset markets, particularly housing.
My feeling is that this time around, monetary stimulus isn't going to work as the mechanism for getting the cheap money into the hands of businesses and consumers has broken down.
That is why I think we'll see deflation unless the Bank of England starts printing money by increasing the amount of money available to the Government with 'steralising' the increase by selling bonds.
At present, the Fed isn't selling bonds as quickly as it should so at present they are printing money (in a Mugabe fashion). It is generally assumed that they will get round to selling the bonds soon. If they don't then they will quickly discover that bond vigilantes aren't dead, they're just resting!
Bang on. :money:
And then we'll also discover that inflation isn't a thing of the past.--
Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.0 -
What was the spread from the official BoE base rate like though? I'd guess LIBOR was within a few tens of bps of base rate.
That is discussed above, hard to tell but I think you are correct.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
-
PasturesNew wrote: »Five to five.
....and it's Crackerjack!0 -
Sorry to be a pedant
(but I'm in a grumpy mood tonite)
LIBOR didn't exist in 1981.....
.....and Minimum Lending Rate was the rate that the Bank lent money to members of the London Discount Market Association, and thus was set and used in a totally different way to what we now refer to, as the Base Rate (and it's in-built inflexibility was the main reason why it was replaced by the Band 1 to 4 dealing rates in August 1981)
Right...got that of my chest. :cool:
.......:eek:'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
Ahhh, thank goodness we can get this over with.
Wise: Jamaica was captured by the English in 1655
Morecambe: Yes, and they lost it again at ten past five!!
Audience: Hysterical laughter.
ps. You don't know how carefully I checked my 24 hour clock knowledge on that one. After the jpeg incident I have no desire to be caught out by PN yet again.
No,no I must`nt, oh well tin helmet on................
I say, I say, I say, my wifes gone to the West Indies
Jamaica?
No she went on her on accord.
I thank you!!!!0 -
Sorry to be a pedant
(but I'm in a grumpy mood tonite)
LIBOR didn't exist in 1981.....
.....and Minimum Lending Rate was the rate that the Bank lent money to members of the London Discount Market Association, and thus was set and used in a totally different way to what we now refer to, as the Base Rate (and it's in-built inflexibility was the main reason why it was replaced by the Band 1 to 4 dealing rates in August 1981)
Right...got that of my chest. :cool:
.......:eek:
The graph was named 3 month interbank lending rate, although not called LIBOR is this not the same?'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
The graph was named 3 month interbank lending rate, although not called LIBOR is this not the same?
I think it is but it's not smoothed by taking out the outlying rates as LIBOR is.
I've packed my book from the 1950s called 'How the City Works' written by the Daily Mail City editor so I can't look it up.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards