We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Andrew Marr The History of Modern Britain
Comments
-
'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0
-
I also read somewhere that the Wall Street Crash started with too much credit.I couldn't believe it - credit, in the early 1900's? Yes, money lent to buy new Ford cars to people who couldn't repay! These repeats are as old astime - why do they keep letting them happen at ever more dangerous levels?
Andrew Marrs series is really interesting.
Are you for real?'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
the selling off of the "family silver".
But how did the consumer not benefit from selling off the inefficient nationalised industries that were BT, BG, the Water boards and Electric companies?
Telephone bills are dirt cheap as a result
And would we want a return to basic rate taxes of 30%+?
If this aspect of the Thatcher Revolution was so awful, then why didn't New Labour even think about reversing any of it [or the Thatcher trade union reforms] in spite New Labour's 15 year monopoly on power?
Could it be that they agreed with her?0 -
Oh yes, and selling off local authority housing!0
-
But how did the consumer not benefit from selling off the inefficient nationalised industries that were BT, BG, the Water boards and Electric companies?
Telephone bills are dirt cheap as a result
Yes, phone bills are cheap - but BT won't stump up the readies to pay for an update to the old copper-wire systems, as it will benifit it's LLU competitors without them having to pay for it. This means that most of Britains communication system being stuck with very old technology - and consequently being slower by comparison.
BG - prices went up how much this year? 20-30% on top of 10-15% rises earlier
Elec - see Gas
Water - Depends where you live. I'm in Devon, where the average water bill is three times more than Thames customers pay, so we can pay to keep all the beaches nice an pollution-free for when the rest of the population want to come on holiday. A national water company would mean that the clean-up burden was shared equally.
Just an alternative viewpoint0 -
I fear we will never learn the lesson – human greed and short-sightedness always takes over. Today, people are far more indebted than they were in Margaret Thatcher's time – and have much higher expectations about what they 'deserve'. Most younger people have never experienced real hardship (although they think they are doing so), whereas many of those who were in heavy debt in the early 80s had lived through quite hard times (by comparison) in their childhoods in the 50s and 60s.I am not sure this make any sense.
In what way doesn't it make sense to you?0 -
I fear we will never learn the lesson – human greed and short-sightedness always takes over. Today, people are far more indebted than they were in Margaret Thatcher's time – and have much higher expectations about what they 'deserve'. Most younger people have never experienced real hardship (although they think they are doing so), whereas many of those who were in heavy debt in the early 80s had lived through quite hard times (by comparison) in their childhoods in the 50s and 60s.
In what way doesn't it make sense to you?
In the 50s and 60s there was hope in the future, company pensions were the future, the talk was about what people would do with the increased leisure time.
In those days kids could leave school at 16 or 18 and enter a profession with 0 or A levels, now they need a degree. I think todays kids are experiencing real hardship, drugs that suck in and destroy lives , yes they have a choice but fortunately kids in the 50's and 60,s didn't.
No I don't think the young have it easy now.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
So I guess you weren`t a miner that not only lost his job but saw his whole community decimated.
Why prolong the inevitable.?
Mrs Thatcher brought prosperity to millions of people.
Middle England has never really looked back tho the Labour lot are trying to tax us back down to the working class levels.
People who criticise Mrs Thatcher are bitter and jealous of those who profited in the true capilastistic style. They think its cool to have a go at someone when they werent around to judge for themsemleves.0 -
Um, I wasn`t around to judge for myself. I don`t think so. Prosperity that ended up with many losing their homes and incomes. I was in a very well paid job long before Thatch came to power. I have no bitterness for my part, I just saw an someone who thought she was the Queen using bully boy tactics to thrust her will on everyone. That woman not only destroyed the manufacturing base, sold off our oil, and took 3 million into unemployment.
The !!!!! even screwed up the little bit by reducing state pensions increasing from the average earnings to the rate of inflation. Dreadful woman!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards