We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Property prices will have stabilised by this time next year. Yes or NO?
Comments
-
I can't speak for anyone else but Goldmans understood these products IMO. They were creating them and trading them.
I think the problem understanding was on the receiving end not the creating.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
I think the problem understanding was on the receiving end not the creating.
They had a desk trading them for their own positions. Someone on the desk decided that they were going to go wrong and managed to persuade his boss that they should short rather than hold long positions. They made a few billion dollars for the bank (and probably a few tens of millions for themselves).
Separately Goldmans were creating and selling CDOs. They ended up stuck with a big long position from what they had underwritten I believe. Certainly the inventory list seemed to grow very quickly and daily from a few items to a few hundred over the course of a couple of months.0 -
My feelings are that the Bankers didn't try to understand the complexities of the system, they only looked at the bonuses that they were about to recieve on every deal.
The FSA didn't argue because they were gullible enough to actually TRUST the bankers who were in turn, trusting the institutions that proposed the deals (More bankers!!)"Unhappiness is not knowing what we want, and killing ourselves to get it."Post Count: 4,111 Thanked 3,111 Times in 1,111 Posts (Actual figures as they once were))Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea.0 -
scousethife wrote: »Didnt they drop at the start of the 90's? I thought they did
No, they flat-lined. Maybe if they'd have fallen we wouldn't be here? Property prices had never fallen in the US since the Great Depression.0 -
setmefree2 wrote: »No, they flat-lined. Maybe if they'd have fallen we wouldn't be here? Property prices had never fallen in the US since the Great Depression.
How do you come to that conclusion? Use the Nationwide House price calculator and you'll find prices droped every year from 1990 - 1994
http://www.nationwide.co.uk/hpi/default.asp?calculate=true0 -
mystic_trev wrote: »How do you come to that conclusion? Use the Nationwide House price calculator and you'll find prices droped every year from 1990 - 1994
http://www.nationwide.co.uk/hpi/default.asp?calculate=true
Sorry we are discussing US house prices?
Anyways, homeownership in the USA in the early 1990's was not much higher than the number who owned homes in the the 1960's. Home ownership rates in the US rocketed from 1995 to 2005.0 -
setmefree2 wrote: »In the US they only ever did - this is the first time HPs have fallen there....:cool: So some might argue it was a fair assumption.
http://homepage.mac.com/ttsmyf/RD_RJShomes_PSav.html
That graph says otherwise.0 -
monkeymaster wrote: »
Back in a tick - I'm off to get me a graph too;) On second thoughts I don't need to - your graph shows that was a barely discernable dip in house prices in the early 1990's...0 -
monkeymaster wrote: »
I think it depends whether you're talking real or nominal house prices. EG:
I think nominal house prices last fell on average across the US in the 1930s.
Local markets will behave differently. The 'US housing market' is a bit like talking about 'the European housing market'. It makes much more sense at a lower level although the whole can tell you something.0 -
setmefree2 wrote: »Back in a tick - I'm off to get me a graph too;) On second thoughts I don't need to - your graph shows that was a barely discernable dip in house prices in the early 1990's...
Hmmm :rotfl:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards