We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Rental contract - "change to agreement" clause

I am a would-be tenant.

I feel nervous about the following extract from my contract. I'd be grateful for any advice of how to proceed....

The contract states :

"Changes to the agreement: The owner can change any part of the agreement provided at least 2 weeks notice is given in writing and provided such change is not unreasonable. If the lodger cannot comply with the changes to the original agreement she may leave the property after damages have been checked and upkeep up until the day she leaves has been paid for (without having to find another lodger)."


Thanks!

Comments

  • fimonkey
    fimonkey Posts: 1,238
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    Hi,

    Does this apply to 'lodging' in that you live in the same dwelling as the landlord? If so, you don't really have many rights anyway, so I'd be wary full stop.

    You have more rights as a tenant if your landlord doesn't live with you.
  • kunekune
    kunekune Posts: 1,909 Forumite
    What would worry me, if you are just a lodger, is that you seem to have a restriction on whether you can leave - I take it that's what the reference to finding another lodger. With an assured shorthold tenancy, the standard tenancy type for renting a whole house or flat, you have a fixed term, and couldn't just up and go with no liability during that period. But in a lodger situation the idea that you are tied in for a minimum period (how long is it?) is pretty appalling. What if you don't like living there? I'd be very wary indeed of this agreement, it actually sounds worse than the 'no rights at all' firmonkey mentions!
    Mortgage started on 22.5.09 : £129,600
    Overpayments to date: £3000
    June grocery challenge: 400/600
  • Yes, it's a "Short Term Lodger Agreement" and is fixed term (I chose the leaving date - approx 10 months) with both parties able to give 2 months notice.

    The rest of the contract is convenient except the "change of agreement to ANY part of contract and 2 weeks notice" bit which seems to give the owner a lot of power.

    I wasn't sure if this was standard - I guess it's not from your posts - thanks.
  • real1314
    real1314 Posts: 4,432 Forumite
    angelique wrote: »
    Yes, it's a "Short Term Lodger Agreement" and is fixed term (I chose the leaving date - approx 10 months) with both parties able to give 2 months notice.

    The rest of the contract is convenient except the "change of agreement to ANY part of contract and 2 weeks notice" bit which seems to give the owner a lot of power.

    I wasn't sure if this was standard - I guess it's not from your posts - thanks.


    The bit that saves it is the "provided such change is not unreasonable" bit.

    Essentially, the landlord/lady can change the terms to add/remove something that is generally percieved to be "reasonable". I'd reckon this is very common given that the LL cannot create an agreement that could cover every possible scenario, and that the close interdependence that can exist in these tenancies requires the option of clear boundaries.
    It also states that the Tenant can leave without finding a replacment in such circumstances.

    Perhaps some respondees are not actually reading the OP when taking agin the LL and just rely on the Animal Rent dictat: Tenant Good; LL Bad?
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.