We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Savings & Mortgage in the same place
jezzie_bean
Posts: 3 Newbie
I dont know if this question has already been covered; But does anyone know how it would work if I have a £60k mortgage with the same building society as I have £60k savings with & it goes bust does it mean that becasue we are both technically creditors & debtors to each other we are 'quits' ?
I see this as another way of not having to worry about FSCS robustness or the BS stability.
I see this as another way of not having to worry about FSCS robustness or the BS stability.
0
Comments
-
That is correct. So overall you'd be mortgage free with no savings.0
-
See FAQ 5 on the FSCS website - http://www.fscs.org.uk/consumer/faqs/deposit_claims_faqs/0
-
Many thanks to both, although reading FAQ in detail it states:
"For example, if a depositor had a mortgage of £200,000 and savings of £150,000 with the same bank, set off may be applied by the Insolvency Practitioner dealing with the bank failure."
Aside from what may be covered by the FSCS (£50k) the way the above is written seems to imply it is at the discretion of the Practitioner as to wether the offset will be applied.
I am reading this incorrectly?0 -
It depends how the word 'may' is interpreted.jezzie_bean wrote: »I am reading this incorrectly?
You have interpreted it in its conditional sense but, in its permissive sense, the sentence could mean that the Insolvency Practitioner can (i.e. has the legal ability to) apply the offset as required, rather than a mandatory obligation to apply it.
There's little doubt that it would be applied where required to meet the insolvent institution's debts.0 -
OK - thanks for your help0
-
When I looked into this, it seemed that there were a small number of building societies where the offsetting would not occur. i.e. you'd owe your £60k mortgage to New Provider and have to claim £50k from the FSCS, losing £10k.
Of course, sod's law, I can't find the article that said this.
EDIT: Here it is:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2008/sep/21/mortgages.banksBuilding societies set different terms and conditions for their offset mortgages, so a customer's savings might or might not be automatically offset against his outstanding mortgage if the building society failed. In the latter case the saver would still have to claim any money back through the FSCS.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards