We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Marriage and two properties

My daughter married in July. Both she and her new husband had properties purchased 6 years ago when they were at University. They have just sold her house and bought a new home jointly using the equity from her property (120k). He has retained his property which also has equity of 100k+ and has been let for several years. Can anyone advise if there is anything legal that needs/can be done to limit future CGT. Should his property now be put into joint names and if so would this incur a stamp duty liability?

Comments

  • Ian_W
    Ian_W Posts: 3,778 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic
    There are some interesting posts about CGT on a second property on THIS THREAD that may assist you.

    CGT is an awefully complex tax and, in view of the sums involved, I would suggest they seek professional advice before they consider selling in order to minimise their liability and become aware of what reliefs are available [eg taper relief etc].

    I would have thought it would be beneficial to have both named on the deads for a number of reasons, not least that each has a personal allowance [current tax year £8,500 I believe] to set against any capital gains. I wouldn't have thought that gave rise to SDLT, but I could be wrong.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.7K Life & Family
  • 259.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.