We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

will these type of neg equity mortgages come back?

Options
2»

Comments

  • opinions4u
    opinions4u Posts: 19,411 Forumite
    rover25 wrote: »
    Also I wonder was there a maximum amount that these individuals were able to transfer into a new negative equity mortgage
    Fairly sure the one I looked at was limited to 25% and £125k (e.g. max value £100k).

    One would assume this would need to more than double now.

    <shudder> at the risk profile!
  • Sim_2
    Sim_2 Posts: 94 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    We had one of these some 15 years ago - made for a bizarre situation where you had a maximum (maximum earnings multiples) and minimum (minimum needed not to push the total over 125%) purchase price range. We had to find a house priced between 61K and 65K - but it meant there were next time buyers in the market, which is precisely why this type of loan will be needed when things stabilise.
  • koexelek
    koexelek Posts: 7,847 Forumite
    People like C & G and Bank of Scotland used to to them up to 125% of the new purchase price.

    I can see lenders risking offering these types of schemes in the short term future, while funds are short. It is just too high risk
    I am a Mortgage adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • opinions4u
    opinions4u Posts: 19,411 Forumite
    koexelek wrote: »
    People like C & G and Bank of Scotland used to to them up to 125% of the new purchase price.

    I can see lenders risking offering these types of schemes in the short term future, while funds are short. It is just too high risk
    Not even if it means retaining the same risk profile for the same individual customer and merely moving that to a new property?
  • koexelek
    koexelek Posts: 7,847 Forumite
    opinions4u wrote: »
    Not even if it means retaining the same risk profile for the same individual customer and merely moving that to a new property?

    Now that's a different matter.

    I was thinking more of lenders taking on new borrowers from other companies with existing negative equity.

    What you speak of is more of a possibility
    I am a Mortgage adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • rover25
    rover25 Posts: 387 Forumite
    Wondering Sim, how did you go about this? Did you have to have a buyer for your house before you could do this and how much did you have in negative equity?
  • opinions4u
    opinions4u Posts: 19,411 Forumite
    rover25 wrote: »
    Wondering Sim, how did you go about this? Did you have to have a buyer for your house before you could do this and how much did you have in negative equity?
    The 1990s schemes that I was familiar with required you to have a buyer and complete simultaneously. The didn't allow you to increase the £ or % of negative equity.

    What they did do was allow you to move house and take your negative equity with you to the new mortgage.
  • Sim_2
    Sim_2 Posts: 94 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    rover25 wrote: »
    Wondering Sim, how did you go about this? Did you have to have a buyer for your house before you could do this and how much did you have in negative equity?

    Details are a bit vague in my mind after all this time but we had spoken to Lloyds bank and knew where we stood, then got a buyer before we could apply formally and move our mortgage to them. Within a couple of years the market had picked up and we were no longer in negative equity.
  • maninthestreet
    maninthestreet Posts: 16,127 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    rover25 wrote: »
    Wondering Sim, how did you go about this? Did you have to have a buyer for your house before you could do this and how much did you have in negative equity?

    Yes, you had to find a buyer for your house. In my case, I had bought my house for £54,000 and had accepted an offer of £37,500 for it, so £16,500 negative equity. The house I was buying cost £98,500 , but I used £13,000 of my life savings to reduce the negative equity to £3,500. The sale of my old house and purchase of my property had to coincide, just like any other house sale/purchase.
    "You were only supposed to blow the bl**dy doors off!!"
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.