We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Couple have £1.2million in Iceland (IofM branch/not protected)

13

Comments

  • Bromley86
    Bromley86 Posts: 1,123 Forumite
    And to be honest, if I had 1.2 mill, I would be doing my upmost to avoid paying the tax (legally) because the government would want to rape you to the tune of £480,000 (40% of it).
    The government only taxes the income, not the full amount.
  • YorkshireBoy
    YorkshireBoy Posts: 31,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    And to be honest, if I had 1.2 mill, I would be doing my upmost to avoid paying the tax (legally) because the government would want to rape you to the tune of £480,000 (40% of it).
    Did you mean to say "£1.2m of annual taxable income"? Because I'd be pretty peeved if I simply "had" £1.2m and the Government suddenly wanted 40% of it.
  • dkmax_2
    dkmax_2 Posts: 228 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    nilrem wrote: »
    For Gods sake have a heart! :mad:

    One day you may make a mistake and hopefully people won't adopt your attitude to your misfortune!

    Few people are crowing over the misfortune aspect. It is the unreasonable expection that the misfortunate investors have that other people will pick up the pieces that is the problem.

    I think that those that are feeling sympathetic should reach into their pockets and give generously. They'll have their million quid in no time.
  • And to be honest, if I had 1.2 mill, I would be doing my upmost to avoid paying the tax (legally) because the government would want to rape you to the tune of £480,000 (40% of it).
    If you had £1.2 million, and were getting 7% on it, you would be paying a maximum of £33,600 on the interest of £84k each year. And that's assuming you already had income that brought you up to the 40% threshold. If you didn't it would considerably lower.
    "The trouble with quotations on the Internet is that you never know whether they are genuine" - Charles Dickens
  • markelock
    markelock Posts: 1,735 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    the government have said more than once that all money held in Iceland is safe.

    also, they wouldn't take 40% of the total, it's not a capital gain, or their income for the year, they would tax the interest on the capital only.
    Remember the time he ate my goldfish? And you lied and said I never had goldfish. Then why did I have the bowl Bart? Why did I have the bowl?
  • apt
    apt Posts: 3,249 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The government has never said 'all money held in Iceland is safe.' It has said it will refund all the money for all retail depositors in the British operation of Icesave. It has absolutely no jurisdiction and responsibility for offshore accounts of foreign banks. If the couple with £1.2 million in the IOM account are to get more than £50,000 provided by the IOM compensation scheme it must come through recovered assets of the bank, a possible mis-selling case against their financial adviser or private charity. It cannot come from the FSCS compensation scheme or the general British taxpayer.
  • amcluesent
    amcluesent Posts: 9,425 Forumite
    >Mr Johnston said he had joined a website linking depositors in the Icelandic bank.<

    Hmm, now that sounds familiar!
  • whiteflag_3
    whiteflag_3 Posts: 1,395 Forumite
    IT_nerd wrote: »
    Serves them right. £1.2M in a single bank account. OFFSHORE?!
    What in gods name were they thinking?

    Probably thinking their money was safe with a bank that had a Moodys A rating and 100% cover by their parent bank!!

    The Johnstons and their adviser obviously didnt have access to your crystal ball.

    Nerd, at least you will be happy in knowing that the Johnstons and their advsier will more than likely be one of the few real losers in this situation.
  • z1000000
    z1000000 Posts: 129 Forumite
    Well, actually plenty of Councils have millions tied up in the Icelandic Banks. As they aren't Personal savers, they won't be compensated.

    So Nerd and others can have a bloody good gloat when their and their families and friends Council Tax goes up to pay for the lost money!
  • rizla01
    rizla01 Posts: 7,260 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Regardless of the reasons or wisdom for their decision to go offshore,anyone who feels it serves them right or has no sympathy for the devastating position they find themselves in,is really quite an unpleasant individual.


    Iseland Annie, Huh?

    Don't work for the bank, by any chance, do you?
    "Unhappiness is not knowing what we want, and killing ourselves to get it."
    Post Count: 4,111 Thanked 3,111 Times in 1,111 Posts (Actual figures as they once were))
    Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.