We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
NS&I Savings Certificates
Comments
-
I see your point regards "real inflation" it's much higher than the published figures. The ILSC are based on RPI, which is published monthly.
But no other accounts take that into consideration either.
Say an account pays 6% gross interest, that's 4.8% to a standard rate tax payer, or 3.6% to a high rate tax payer.
Compare with an example of a 1% + RPI ILSC - just for example say the RPI rate is 5%:
That's 6% tax free, which is equivalent to 7.5% for a basic rate tax payer or 10% for a high rate tax payer.
Admittedly this is a crude example and assumes RPI if 5% all the time, rather than the fluctuations we see, but still shows the potential for tax and high rate tax payers.0 -
That is not really the point. The issue is what you are getting compared to other savings of a similar nature. If we suppose real inflation is 10%, whilst these certificates pay 5% and other savings pay 4% after tax, then these still work out better overall.Sorry maybe I was unclear, I trust the government that they will pay an interest rate calculated on the basis of their published rates, I'm just not convinced that those published rates are based on the reality of inflation found in the shops.
As Isofar rightly points out, that doesn't stop it being a good (or bad) investment.0 -
Because nobody else is selling a similar product, and certainly not one linked to the "real" figures.then why buy something linked to a fiddled figure, and issued by the bodydoing the fiddling
The only other products to compare it to are based solely on quoted interest rates.
That's what I meant.Count_Dante wrote: »That is not really the point. The issue is what you are getting compared to other savings of a similar nature. If we suppose real inflation is 10%, whilst these certificates pay 5% and other savings pay 4% after tax, then these still work out better overall.0 -
Because nobody else is selling a similar product, and certainly not one linked to the "real" figures.
The only other products to compare it to are based solely on quoted interest rates.
Britannia and Leeds building societies offer 2-year bonds linked to RPI growth+x%. However, unlike NS&I ILSC they are taxable and do not allow early withdrawal.0 -
Leeds BS also offer an index-linked ISA that pays RPI + 1.8%.
It's interesting that the bonus has gone down as a few months ago they were offering RPI + 2.5%.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards