We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Capital One dispute

2»

Comments

  • PROLIANT
    PROLIANT Posts: 6,396 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Scampy wrote: »
    I didn't write the information I am quoting from the money expert website but no I don't think it is the same. The travel agent are a third party and are the company which the credit card has a relationship with whereas the TV shop would be on the credit card statement, so if they went bust the credit card company would be liable.
    The agent took the funds from the credit card on their visa machine, they did not deliver the goods/service paid for by the customer/credit card company, third party or not my point is what is the difference between a holiday and a telly?..Non what so ever in terms of an electronic payment, the bottom line is the supplier..the travel agent, did not "supply" the service, they however did take the money as Dixons or Currys would have during a payment for a TV that was in turn purchased from a warehouse/supplier that they use..same as the travel agent purchased the "holiday" from the airline...the supplier to the agent.
    Since when has the world of computer software design been about what people want? This is a simple question of evolution. The day is quickly coming when every knee will bow down to a silicon fist, and you will all beg your binary gods for mercy.
  • flyaway
    flyaway Posts: 96 Forumite
    PROLIANT wrote: »
    I response to this debate it is black and white as far as the law goes, you are covered under the CCA sec 75, doesn't matter where you made the purchase the supplier has failed to supply the service and or goods that you have paid for (or should I say what the credit card company has paid for), end of, contact Capital One with a threat of leagal action unless they comply with the joint contact that you signed between yourself and capital one. It is in black and white and is not open to dispute as the contract was legally approved prior to issue to the banks customers. remeber, you are claiming for goods/service not received, not the fact that a half a job airline went down the pot.

    Thanks, that's what I thought. I have written to the travel agent and asked them for a full refund and given them 7 days to do so. I sent it by recorded delivery yesterday. So if I don't get a refund perhaps I might get a written reply to send to the credit card company. This is what the CC have asked me to do.
    If I don't get a reply, I will write again to the CC stating CCA sec 75.
    I'm not sure what else I can do. Yes, I could go the ATOL CAA route as the holiday was ATOL bonded but I've been told and have seen that people are not even getting a reply from ATOL. So I decided to go the quickest route to try and get the money back.
    Thanks for all your help on this. I'll let you know what happens, if anything!
  • flyaway
    flyaway Posts: 96 Forumite
    Scampy wrote: »
    I didn't write the information I am quoting from the money expert website but no I don't think it is the same. The travel agent are a third party and are the company which the credit card has a relationship with whereas the TV shop would be on the credit card statement, so if they went bust the credit card company would be liable.

    Just to clear up my situation, I booked the package holiday through travel agent and paid them with the credit card and their name is on the credit card statement. The travel agent is a retail agent for ATOL holders, in this case The Really Great Holiday Company which was part of XL and held a ATOL number. So from what you've all said, it appears that the travel agent is responsible and therefore should refund my money. But if they don't then the credit card company should under the CCA section 75. Is that right?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.