We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Icesave - A bit of bad news

2456

Comments

  • KingL
    KingL Posts: 1,713 Forumite
    For me, the bullet list in post 10 is still there, the quote from post 1 has been removed.
  • Patr100
    Patr100 Posts: 2,856 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Fella wrote: »
    It's still there for me?

    If an Icelandic bank failed UK customers are protected up to £50,000
    95% of Icesave's UK customers have less than £50,000 saved
    UK savers have the first £16,170 of their money protected by Iceland
    The remaining £33,830 or double for joint accounts is protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS)
    If Iceland goes bankrupt, the FSCS would cover the entire £50,000

    That doesn't imply what the original Sky reports implied ie the Passport scheme was changed but the final sentence is at least more reassuring give total melt down -
    if correct, though of course refers an entire country going under not an institution.
  • derbyjon
    derbyjon Posts: 42 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    The Sky article has been changed to include the following bullet-pointed box:

    Icelandic Banks: Deposit Insurance
      • If an Icelandic bank failed UK customers are protected up to £50,000
      • 95% of Icesave's UK customers have less than £50,000 saved
      • UK savers have the first £16,170 of their money protected by Iceland
      • The remaining £33,830 or double for joint accounts is protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS)
      • If Iceland goes bankrupt, the FSCS would cover the entire £50,000
    I'm not sure whether to believe it, but hope it's true. If not, then the FSCS are effectively sending out a warning that all savings should be pulled out of banks operating a passport scheme.
  • zaccy
    zaccy Posts: 29 Forumite
    When did Icesave officially go into receivership?

    Today=£50k compensation.
    Yesterday=£35k compensation.

    Have to say I thought it rather odd that the FSA introduced the increased limit from today rather than last week when they announced it, or Monday.
  • edwinac_2
    edwinac_2 Posts: 268 Forumite
    zaccy wrote: »
    When did Icesave officially go into receivership?

    Today=£50k compensation.
    Yesterday=£35k compensation.

    Have to say I thought it rather odd that the FSA introduced the increased limit from today rather than last week when they announced it, or Monday.

    Exactly! The timing of the limit increase is peculiar.

    When people questioned this, the City's plaything, Robert Peston, the business editor at the BBC, called them Conspiracy Theorists!

    That is pretty much a coded admission there is something funny going at the FSA and Treasury over the FSCS compensation scheme.
    "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
    -- Thomas Jefferson
  • KingL
    KingL Posts: 1,713 Forumite
    In case it's not obvious, the first incarnation of the Sky article had the FSCS covering the full £50k if the Icelandic passport scheme failed to pay up. The second version (the bullet list version) says it would cover the £50k if Iceland (the country) goes bankrupt.
  • LGG_2
    LGG_2 Posts: 489 Forumite
    When did Icesave officially go into receivership?

    theres confusion because its called going into receivership because its been taken over by the goverment even though its not real receivership if u get what i mean. anyway thats what ive read. so not sure why ppl are saying you will ahve to start claiming as that hasnt been anounced yet
  • Fella
    Fella Posts: 7,921 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Their PM seemed to be implying the bank will continue as normal soon - which conflicts with other reports that suggest we start filing claims now.

    Thought he seemed reasonably impressive to be fair, although compared to Brown a turd on a bun would be impressive.
  • Paul_Herring
    Paul_Herring Posts: 7,484 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    powerRIP wrote: »
    Icelandic PM: "Very unlikely the UK investors will lose out..... the bank is currently working perfectly normally"

    Not from where I'm sitting it isn't :rolleyes:
    Conjugating the verb 'to be":
    -o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.