We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Boom, Boom, Boom, Bust, Bust, Bust

135

Comments

  • skap7309
    skap7309 Posts: 874 Forumite
    ess0two wrote: »
    Yeah even cranks on here expecting 50% drops,its hilarious.

    Please, why is it hilarious? I can understand it possibly will not but '86-'87 saw a 32% rise in one year, '02-'03 saw a 25.8% rise in one year. Please explain why a 50% drop over the entire length of this monster crash is not possible.
  • skap7309
    skap7309 Posts: 874 Forumite
    Heyman wrote: »
    Good Lord.

    It's all just discussion and you pick what you want to discuss and what you don't. If there's nothing worth discussing then start your own thread.

    Hardly rocket science is it?

    You have possibly missed the point. Good discussions begin and then mindless trolls ruin them. I have started discussions and then someone :rolleyes: will post a needless addition and then thats the end of that.
  • Realy
    Realy Posts: 1,017 Forumite
    Well, it would take house prices back to more typical levels for a start. All it takes is a 30% crash in prices (nearly half-way there already), and roughly 4 years of salary growth. Not that far-fetched.

    Oh so I can't use adjusted figures to argue that prices won't drop 50%, but you can.:rotfl: .
    I think the word is hypocrite.
  • Realy
    Realy Posts: 1,017 Forumite
    skap7309 wrote: »
    Please, why is it hilarious? I can understand it possibly will not but '86-'87 saw a 32% rise in one year, '02-'03 saw a 25.8% rise in one year. Please explain why a 50% drop over the entire length of this monster crash is not possible.

    Please explain why they are?
  • skap7309
    skap7309 Posts: 874 Forumite
    Realy wrote: »
    Please explain why they are?

    Sorry??? :confused:

    If you read my post you will see i put ''i understand it possibly will not'' therefore have no reason to explain why they will but if people intend on laughing off possible drops and mentioning the word 'impossible' then it would be nice to have an explanation...:rolleyes:
  • Realy
    Realy Posts: 1,017 Forumite
    skap7309 wrote: »
    Sorry??? :confused:

    Trying to guess where prices will be at the end of the crash is nearly impossible now as it all depends on what happens in the credit markets.

    I can not see any good arguments for falls of 15%-99% as I think now no one as a clear picture of what is going to happen. Everything is changing daily.

    PS I posted this before you edited.
  • Turnbull2000
    Turnbull2000 Posts: 1,807 Forumite
    Realy wrote: »
    Oh so I can't use adjusted figures to argue that prices won't drop 50%, but you can.:rotfl: .
    I think the word is hypocrite.

    Because adjusted figures are relevent to my post, whereas your comment on negative equity doesn't make sense. Adjusted house prices have no bearing on nominal mortgage debt.

    What did you say again? Oh aye, 50% crash would mean negative equity for those who bought in the last 25 years lol
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • Realy
    Realy Posts: 1,017 Forumite
    Because adjusted figures are relevent to my post, whereas your comment on negative equity doesn't make sense. Adjusted house prices have no bearing on nominal mortgage debt.

    What did you say again? Oh aye, 50% crash would mean negative equity for those who bought in the last 25 years lol

    But 50% drops would put the majority of motgage holders in negative equity would it not? do people not move house or increase borrowing?

    PS neither does yours as it would still be a 30%. If they purchased last year and it drops 30% that is still a thirty percent drop not 50% their mortgage is not effected by inflation.lol.
  • Turnbull2000
    Turnbull2000 Posts: 1,807 Forumite
    Realy wrote: »
    But 50% drops would put the majority of motgage holders in negative equity would it not? do people not move house or increase borrowing?

    Nope, you're still miles off. Average equity levels are above 50%, and the majority of poeple bought before prices trebled from 1997 onwards.

    Realy wrote: »
    PS neither does yours as it would still be a 30%. If they purchased last year and it drops 30% that is still a thirty percent drop not 50% their mortgage is not effected by inflation.lol.

    You're doing a great job of cornering yourself Realy. This last quote really does show you haven't got a clue. If they purchased last year and actual prices fell 30% in 12 months, this would equate to a 34% fall (house price fall + RPI inflation). Their mortgage would remain the same, less any capital repayments.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • blisk
    blisk Posts: 266 Forumite
    Don't panic peeps, eveythings going to be ok.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.