We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Ftse 100

It is interesting to note that Ftse 100 at points over the last couple of days was lower than the index stood after Labour raided the pension funds in their first budget in July 1997.
'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,188 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    StevieJ wrote: »
    It is interesting to note that Ftse 100 at points over the last couple of days was lower than the index stood after Labour raided the pension funds in their first budget in July 1997.

    It is also one of the worst performing indices of the Western economies in that period as well.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    It is also one of the worst performing indices of the Western economies in that period as well.

    Despite Gordon's Economic miracle :rotfl:

    Like the emperors new clothes, for years no one was brave enough to shout "It's all a Sham !!!!"
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • GeorgeHowell
    GeorgeHowell Posts: 2,739 Forumite
    purch wrote: »
    Despite Gordon's Economic miracle :rotfl:

    Like the emperors new clothes, for years no one was brave enough to shout "It's all a Sham !!!!"

    Oh yes we did, but few listened and the majority chose instead to elect New Labour for three terms.
    No-one would remember the Good Samaritan if he'd only had good intentions. He had money as well.

    The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.

    Margaret Thatcher
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    dunstonh wrote: »
    It is also one of the worst performing indices of the Western economies in that period as well.

    I just knew you were going to write that.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • Paul_Herring
    Paul_Herring Posts: 7,484 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    StevieJ wrote: »
    It is interesting to note that Ftse 100 at points over the last couple of days was lower than the index stood after Labour raided the pension funds in their first budget in July 1997.

    I see what you're saying - it puts it all into perspective: "The only thing worse than Labour raiding the pension schemes is the meltdown of the world economy..." or some such sentiment.

    :rolleyes:
    Conjugating the verb 'to be":
    -o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,188 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    StevieJ wrote: »
    I just knew you were going to write that.

    That stat may be getting a bit old so I ran though a Oct 97 to Oct 08 quick and dirty index chart and saw that the irish market has dropped significantly in recent times and actually comes out worse than the FTSE100 now. I'm no expert on Ireland but I wonder if thats linked to the redirection of EU funds to the East after all those years going into Ireland. Or it was just a market that was in a bubble.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • opinions4u
    opinions4u Posts: 19,411 Forumite
    Our prudent economic miracle under New Labour was built on a property boom.

    Cheap credit markets - expanding mortgage lending - driving higher property prices.

    Bigger stamp duty take for HM Treasury. Oh, and a huge IHT windfall too when Granny drops dead. Not to mention massive Corporation Tax income for Mr Brown too.

    He spent it on something. Can't quite see the benefit, but there are more people in employment than ever before. Most of them either foreign or working for the state. Or foreign and working for the state.

    I won't say I think an alternative political party would have done any better. Not sure they would.

    But this nation is screaming out for leadership that finds a way to stimulate enterprise and reduce state interference. Oh, and dramatically cut welfare spending.

    Not easy when we're on our knees and sinking.
  • GeorgeHowell
    GeorgeHowell Posts: 2,739 Forumite
    opinions4u wrote: »

    But this nation is screaming out for leadership that finds a way to stimulate enterprise and reduce state interference. Oh, and dramatically cut welfare spending.

    You won't get this under Labour, no matter who is in charge. Their overriding priority is what they see as social justice. Considerations of personal wealth, levels of taxation, stimulation of enterprise, government spending control are all completely subordinate to this. Probably 25%-30% of the electorate broadly share this view, and another 30% do not. The remainder vote primarily on the basis of who they think will render them better off in the foreseeable future, and are the cause of the pendulum swinging that charecterises this country's politics. Assuming that at least a 10% lead for the Conservatives continues to the next general election, then we will have a change of government. They will not prove to be miracle workers and will not solve all the problems. But the pendulum will tend to swing away from the notion of social justice as the be all and end all, towards stimulation of wealth creation. Neverthless sooner or later the next administration will run out of steam and get the boot. The the pendulum will then swing back again. That's why this country will not be anywhere near the top of the economic or quality of life league tables any time soon.
    No-one would remember the Good Samaritan if he'd only had good intentions. He had money as well.

    The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.

    Margaret Thatcher
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.