We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Pension rule of thumb: the percentage of gross or net salary?
Options

aristote33
Posts: 125 Forumite
Hello,
I have read with interest the Pensions page of MSE, and I have a small - but somewhat important - question about the pension rule of thumb that follows:
Take the age you start your pension and halve it.
Put this percentage of your salary aside each year until you retire.
Put this percentage of your salary aside each year until you retire.
What salary is it all about? Gross salary before paying NIC, tax, and stakeholder pension? or net salary after NIC, tax, and stakeholder pension have been debited?
In other words, is it the percentage of the gross salary or the disposable salary?
(It might sound a picky question, but over 30-50 years, with interests adding up, it might make a big difference when retirement comes)
How do you understand it yourself?
Thanks,
William
0
Comments
-
Conjugating the verb 'to be":
-o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries0 -
That is a very rough guide so it doesnt really matter if its gross or net. The margin of error is too great.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
-
Thank you.
I am able to save every month with taking into account my gross earnings, and I put aside more than half my age (per cent), so that I somewhat catch up with the delay in the years I have waited for to start doing that.0 -
It's not wise to take this rule as gospel. How much you should save depends on how big a pension you want. There is no point in reducing your current standard of living to pauper level to save to achieve a higher standard of living in retirement than you currently enjoy. In my opinion!0
-
There is no point in reducing your current standard of living to pauper level to save to achieve a higher standard of living in retirement than you currently enjoy. In my opinion!
If, for no other reason, that if you're used to living as a pauper now, you'll carry on doing that in retirement out of habit, and end up not spending all that pension anyway.Conjugating the verb 'to be":
-o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries0 -
I understand your point.
It's just I'm entering active earning life rather late and I'm conscious of the fact that I would rather retire at a normal age rather than having to work unreasonable extra years because I have not planned ahead enough with putting cash aside, on top of having started my working life rather late.
I don't take the rule of thumb as a gospel, but working on a part-time basis, and still earning far much money than what I need to enjoy everyday life, I feel just right with putting away in savings 20% of my gross salary.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards