We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
So what happens if a bailout deal is not reached?
Comments
-
This is what will happen !!
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/28/bailout.deal/index.html
We really are living in Momentous times !!! And in no way is that Hypebole !
Mind you he would say that considering he has $50 billion on the line!
I think it should go something like,
‘Please bail my greedy @rse out, else I'm screwed!’Control is an illusion, chaos is the reality. A successful warrior dances with chaos, and success means simply that one is still alive.0 -
Max_Headroom wrote: »I keep seeing references on the news (and indeed on sites like this) along the lines of "if a bail out of Wall Street is not forthcoming then the fallout would be unthinkable".
Well what is "the fallout"? What's going to happen if a deal is not reached? Can it really be as bad as all that?
And if they do bail the banks out, how long before they go back to their bad old ways? After all, they know they're underwritten now, they can effectively do what they want now they're officially "too big to fail" surely?
It is a very good question. We still have all the wealth that's been created - if the banks go bust the roads don't get ploughed up and the factories keep churning out cars or asprin or small sharp plastic toys for the Generalissimos to leave for me to step on.
So why are the Americans seemingly so anxious to give a load of money to a bunch of rich people to stop them becoming slightly less rich? They must have a pretty compelling reason because the Aussies are planning to give AU$4,000,000,000 to a bunch of rich bankers too.
It's pretty much what the UK Government is doing with the nationalisation of B&B, something that hasn't been looked at in too much detail: there has been no run on B&B; they are well within their regulatory capital requirements. B&B have however just bought (this week) a load of mortgages from GMAC which are defaulting at a rate of over 5%.0 -
moanymoany wrote: »Looks like the bailout is nearly there - only the i's to dot and the t's to cross.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/28/news/economy/Sunday_talks_bailout/index.htm?cnn=yes
I wish I was convinced that it will do more than push back the evil day. :rolleyes:
I have heard several commentators say this is no where near enough !! Even this crazy figure !!0 -
PasturesNew wrote: »If I've got your question right, and my answer, then per capita about $2k, whereas our NR bail out was $3k each to us.
So less than what we're paying for NR.
I suppose this is because there are more of them! Thanks for the info..0 -
A bit of a derail here but my understanding is that the lack of money in the banking system is as a result of people being unable to pay their morgages. And the reason for that is that the price of houses are going down.
So, the government bails the banks out. But what happens if the price of houses keeps going down further and more mortgages go sour?0 -
This is what will happen !!
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/28/bailout.deal/index.html
We really are living in Momentous times !!! And in no way is that Hypebole !
But even there it's just vague "ohh it'd be terrible, jobs, businesses, stuff like that, you know, money and whatnot". It's just all so vague."We can't underestimate what we face as a threat relative to a fiscal meltdown and the impact it would have on Main Street," he said. "This is about people's jobs. It's about people's savings. It's about people's ability to participate in commerce and send their kids to school and be able to borrow money to run their small businesses."
Call me an old cynic, but I can't help thinking of the Y2K Bug. "Ooohh we need to spend millions of pounds, the world is goinng to end, countless millions of electrical appliances from aircraft to fridge/freezers all packing up as they can't cope with date change to 2000, government must spend millions upon millions sorting out the problem before it happens."
Did anyone ever hear of anything that stopped working on the year 2000 date change cos I sure didn't. All I know is that a major sector (IT) got very rich on the back of it. Something I suspect a lot of bankers are about to get (again).
As someone else in this thread said, the factories and roads and trucks and farms will all still be out there, just because a few banks topple over, so what?Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
A bit of a derail here but my understanding is that the lack of money in the banking system is as a result of people being unable to pay their morgages. And the reason for that is that the price of houses are going down.
So, the government bails the banks out. But what happens if the price of houses keeps going down further and more mortgages go sour?
Well, that's bound to happen. The thing is, of course, that whilst most houses will drop 30% to 40% from their peak value, that does not mean the lenders will lose 30% to 40% on all their mortgages. Many people will just get on with paying the interest. A lot of the mortgages were taken out before the peak. Also, believe it or not, some people put down a deposit.
There's nothing for the government to do but keep bailing. At some stage, they'll opt for the easy way out and start printing money, pushing up inflation.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
Max_Headroom wrote: »As someone else in this thread said, the factories and roads and trucks and farms will all still be out there, just because a few banks topple over, so what?
A few banks would not be a problem. All the banks would be. The factories can't pay their staff or buy raw materials without banks, etc etc etc. It all just stops working without banks. So, rather than inventing a whole lot of new ones, it's better just to declare the existing ones solvent.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
Max_Headroom wrote: »I keep seeing references on the news (and indeed on sites like this) along the lines of "if a bail out of Wall Street is not forthcoming then the fallout would be unthinkable".
Well what is "the fallout"? What's going to happen if a deal is not reached? Can it really be as bad as all that?
The world would end if they don't get their 700 billion dollars. Don't question it. Just believe. You want to believe. You are feeling very sleepy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTmXHvGZiSYpoppy100 -
PasturesNew wrote: »Blimey, he wrote a book AND set up all those burger restaurants??!
Busy chap. And he needed staff.......much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards