We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Oh dear - Bradford & Bingley nationalisation looks increasingly likely

13468911

Comments

  • Generali wrote: »
    The only possible value is the value ascribed to the cashflows from the difference between the rate of interest being paid to the savers and the rate of interest being paid by the buying institution in the money markets.

    All banks fund from sources other than their depositors apart perhaps from some tiny mutuals.

    Yes, but's that not the point. Most banks and building societies fund to some extent from their retail deposits, backed up by loans from the money market and various other vehicles such as securitisations and covered bonds.

    Right now, the availability of these other funding lines just isn't there and therefore the the acquisition of £20bn of retail funding balances, at the right price may well be attractive to another bank out there. The long term value may not be much, but in the current climate they may be more valuable than you think
  • wymondham wrote: »
    Will this mean real problems with any buy-to-let mortgage holders who wish to remortgage?
    I sincerely hope so. If alot of the chancers can't remortgage and are so forced to sell this will obviously accelerate the house price crash.
  • Realy
    Realy Posts: 1,017 Forumite
    Looks like Santander are going to get it now.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7641055.stm
  • amcluesent
    amcluesent Posts: 9,425 Forumite
    What are the chances all of B&B's records are passed over to the taxman? HMRC will love to get all the info on BTL landlords and cross-match to last years tax returns!
  • The Government now own my house, i am with Mortgage express a arm of Bradford & Bingley they have been very sheepish lately and i can see why, twice they have debited more money out of my account than they should have, but i had my bank to reverse the debit.Where do i stand with this takeover by the Government, i feel safer now than when B&b had my account.What do you think
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    amcluesent wrote: »
    What are the chances all of B&B's records are passed over to the taxman? HMRC will love to get all the info on BTL landlords and cross-match to last years tax returns!

    I'm pretty sure that in most cases it's illegal for Government departments to share data like that.
  • amcluesent
    amcluesent Posts: 9,425 Forumite
    >The Government now own my house<

    Actually the people now own your house. Ah, collective ownership...how very socialist. I just hope it's not reallocated to the more deserving - 'From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs!"
  • i don't think there will be much change, in fact B&B were not passing on the interest rate changes, not sure now who will be handling the day to day affairs of Mortgage Express.
  • JonnyBravo
    JonnyBravo Posts: 4,103 Forumite
    Mortgage-free Glee!
    At least we're not paying for this one... or so it would seem.

    The Financial Services Compensation Scheme has had a claim made against it, according to Peston on Radio 5 this morning anyhow.

    He outlined the fact that if the mortgages don't make enough money it will be paid for by the compensation scheme not the taxpayer. He said that the money will only be collected in the future though... when the true picture is known and when the banks can afford it. Until then the Govt is going to lend the money.
    The only charge until then is the interest on that money, about £500m for each of the next two years.



    Of course, whether we all pay for it by more expensive credit is another matter. Perhaps expensive credit is what this country needs though.


    Just found a link with him explaining it better than me

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/
  • JonnyBravo wrote: »
    At least we're not paying for this one... or so it would seem.
    Yep, it's all worked out fine and dandy. I can't really see what all the fuss was about in the first place. Much ado about nothing
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.