PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Anyone Sued yet from pulling out of a new build in Scotland

We are stuck in a catch 22, we reserved and signed missives for a new build in Scotland last year, the build is running approx 1 year behind schedule. We're unable to sell our current property despite lowering the asking price. We've been told if we don't complete, we face being sued for marketing costs, massive interest payments, plus any shortfall in the price the house is re-sold for.

I have seen similar posts but none with recent updates. Does anyone have experience of builders suing people for pulling out?
«1

Comments

  • Anon1
    Anon1 Posts: 23 Forumite
    Is there anyone else out there in a similar situation?

    This is front page news today in the Motherwell Times.

    I would greatly appreciate any help you can offer in this matter.
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,052 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    There is an OFT report published today that may offer you some comfort. There is to be a code of practice dealing with delays on new builds, amongst other things.

    http://www.money.co.uk/article/1001520-oft-recommends-new-homeowner-protection.htm

    There is clearly something very, very wrong with a contract that allows the builder to delay by over a year and then requires you to complete with 2 weeks notice. I would strongly recommend seeking legal advice about having the contract overturned. I am not aware of any current cases on this, but there are bound to be some soon.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • Anon1 wrote: »
    We are stuck in a catch 22, we reserved and signed missives for a new build in Scotland last year, the build is running approx 1 year behind schedule. We're unable to sell our current property despite lowering the asking price. We've been told if we don't complete, we face being sued for marketing costs, massive interest payments, plus any shortfall in the price the house is re-sold for.

    I have seen similar posts but none with recent updates. Does anyone have experience of builders suing people for pulling out?

    There are loads of you - I just add the phrase Catastrophic missive fees and link you all up in your own little community....
    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=1104063&highlight=catastrophic+missive
  • RabbitMad
    RabbitMad Posts: 2,069 Forumite
    What you are asking for is a precident. Has somebody been sued and lost or did they win.

    Its not going to help you 15 people posting - we pulled out and we didn't get sued.

    You need to speak to a solicitor to see if you can use the delay on the builders side to get out of the contract but I'm not hopeful for you.

    Lets look at the otherside of the coin. You sign a contract for a new build that should be ready in x months time. As it gets nearer you find out about delays but in the meantime house prices have gone up 10%, another year goes by and the property has gone up another 10% and you now finally sell your house. You had 20% growth on both properties due to the builders delay and are cracking open the bubbley when the builder tries to get out of the contract so they can re-sell the flat for 20% more - would you be happy?
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,052 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    The difference is that it''s in the builder's hands when he completes the house.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • Hi

    Myself and my partner signed the missives on a flat 8 months ago, we have just had it confirmed from the solicitor that the builder is letting us out of the contract! We dont have to pay any remarketing fees but will lose our deposit, which was 1500. We are really pleased, so I would say try and you might get out of the missives!
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,052 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I am not familiar with the Daily Record. Is it a load of complete rubbish? Anyway, it says: "Sneaky clauses in missives are making buyers liable for any drop in property values". That's a very odd use of the word sneaky. The whole point about the missives is that it's a contract to buy/sell at a particular price. What did the buyers think they were signing?
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • latecomer
    latecomer Posts: 4,331 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Its like the Scottish version of the Sun if that helps clarify things.....
  • Sneaky clauses in missives are making buyers liable for any drop in property values if they fail to complete the deal. They are also demanding interest be paid until such houses are sold on.

    Sounds more like standard contract law than anything sneaky, to me. In English legal terms, anyway.
    ...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.6K Life & Family
  • 256.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.